Fluctuating Code Status: Strategies to Minimize End-of-Life Conflict in the Neurocritical Care Setting

Background: There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient’s wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hospice & palliative medicine 2022-01, Vol.39 (1), p.79-85
Hauptverfasser: Rath, Kelly A., Tucker, Kristi L., Lewis, Ariane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient’s wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions. Methods: Case report and discussion of the associated ethical issues. Results: We present a case of a patient with a pontine stroke, in which the family struggled with decision-making about goals-of-care, leading to fluctuation in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care, then back to Full Code, and finally to Do Not Resuscitate-Do Not Intubate. We discuss factors that contributed to this situation and methods to avoid conflict. Additionally, we review the effects of discord at the end-of-life on patients, families, and the healthcare team. Conclusion: It is imperative that healthcare teams proactively collaborate with families to minimize end-of-life conflict by emphasizing decision-making that prioritizes the best interest and autonomy of the patient.
ISSN:1049-9091
1938-2715
DOI:10.1177/10499091211017872