Fluctuating Code Status: Strategies to Minimize End-of-Life Conflict in the Neurocritical Care Setting
Background: There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient’s wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions. Method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of hospice & palliative medicine 2022-01, Vol.39 (1), p.79-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient’s wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions.
Methods:
Case report and discussion of the associated ethical issues.
Results:
We present a case of a patient with a pontine stroke, in which the family struggled with decision-making about goals-of-care, leading to fluctuation in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care, then back to Full Code, and finally to Do Not Resuscitate-Do Not Intubate. We discuss factors that contributed to this situation and methods to avoid conflict. Additionally, we review the effects of discord at the end-of-life on patients, families, and the healthcare team.
Conclusion:
It is imperative that healthcare teams proactively collaborate with families to minimize end-of-life conflict by emphasizing decision-making that prioritizes the best interest and autonomy of the patient. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1049-9091 1938-2715 |
DOI: | 10.1177/10499091211017872 |