Variation in Administration of Cyclophosphamide and Mesna in the Treatment of Childhood Malignancies

The objective of this study was to describe the variation in preparation and administration of cyclophosphamide, mesna, and hydration for the treat ment of childhood malignancies within clinical trial protocol documents. All cyclophosphamide-containing cooperative group (Pediatric Oncology Group) pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric oncology nursing 2001-01, Vol.18 (1), p.37-45
Hauptverfasser: Dunn Sievers, Theresa, Lagan, Mary Anne, Bartel, Sylvia B., Rasco, Christina, Blanding, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this study was to describe the variation in preparation and administration of cyclophosphamide, mesna, and hydration for the treat ment of childhood malignancies within clinical trial protocol documents. All cyclophosphamide-containing cooperative group (Pediatric Oncology Group) protocols that were open at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in April 1998 were evaluated. Among the 14 active protocols, there were 23 unique cyclophosphamide regimens. Marked variation existed in infusion rate, fluid type, and volume used for admixing cyclophosphamide and mesna, as defined in the "Treatment" section of the protocols that we evaluated. Further variation was found in the type, amount, and rate of infusion of prehydration and posthydration fluid. Internal inconsistency existed within the protocols pertaining to the administration methods described in the "Agent Information," "Treatment," and "Consent" sec tions of the written documents. Clinical trial protocol documents serve as reference material for health care providers who prescribe, dispense, and administer protocol chemotherapy. Misinterpretation of protocol docu ments and clinician orders are contributing factors in serious and deadly medication errors. Internal inconsistency within protocol documents and variation in drug administration across protocols is a potential source of error. We recommend improved accuracy, clarity, and internal consistency of protocol documents to improve patient safety and compliance with protocol specifications. In addition, the use of standard concentrations, volumes, and methods of administration of chemotherapeutic agents and accompanying fluids is recommended.
ISSN:1043-4542
1532-8457
DOI:10.1177/104345420101800105