ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 update (adults)

Summary statements (1) Peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be considered a suitable modality for treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) in all settings (1B). Guideline 2: Access and fluid delivery for acute PD in adults (2.1) Flexible peritoneal catheters should be used where resources and expertise exist (1B) (optimal). (2.2) Rigid catheters and improvised catheters using nasogastric tubes and other cavity drainage catheters may be used in resource-poor environments where they may still be life-saving (1C) (minimum standard). (2.3) We recommend catheters should be tunnelled to reduce peritonitis and peri-catheter leak (practice point). (2.4) We recommend that the method of catheter implantation should be based on patient factors and locally available skills (1C). (2.5) PD catheter implantation by appropriately trained nephrologists in patients without contraindications is safe and functional results equate to those inserted surgically (1B). (2.6) Nephrologists should receive training and be permitted to insert PD catheters to ensure timely dialysis in the emergency setting (practice point). (2.7) We recommend, when available, percutaneous catheter insertion by a nephrologist should include assessment with ultrasonography (2C). (2.8) Insertion of PD catheter should take place under complete aseptic conditions using sterile technique (practice point). (2.9) We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to PD catheter implantation (1B). (2.10) A closed delivery system with a Y connection should be used (1A) (optimal). In resource poor areas, spiking of bags and makeshift connections may be necessary and can be considered (minimum standard). (2.11) The use of automated or manual PD exchanges are acceptable and this will be dependent on local availability and practices (practice point). Guideline 3: Peritoneal dialysis solutions for acute PD (3.1) In patients who are critically ill, especially those with significant liver dysfunction and marked elevation of lactate levels, bicarbonate containing solutions should be used (1B) (optimal). Where these solutions are not available, the use of lactate containing solutions is an alternative (practice point) (minimum standard). (3.2) Commercially prepared solutions should be used (optimal). However, where resources do not permit this, then locally prepared fluids may be life-saving and with careful observation of sterile preparation procedure, peritonitis rates are not increased (1C) (minimum standard). (3.3) Once