D-dimer from central and peripheral blood samples in asymptomatic central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with cancer

Objectives To evaluate the usefulness of a negative D-dimer in peripheral or central venous blood to screen for asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. Methods D-dimer was measured in blood from central venous catheter and peripheral venous samples in 48 patients with cancer. As...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phlebology 2019-02, Vol.34 (1), p.52-57
Hauptverfasser: Nañez-Terreros, Homero, Jaime-Perez, Jose C, Muñoz-Espinoza, Linda E, Camara-Lemaroy, Carlos R, Ornelas-Cortinas, Gerardo E, Ramos-Dena, Ricardo D, Gonzalez-Guerrero, Juan F, Nangullasmu-Plasencia, Tomas, Gonzalez-Escamilla, Moises, Chipuli-Lopez, Osvaldo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the usefulness of a negative D-dimer in peripheral or central venous blood to screen for asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. Methods D-dimer was measured in blood from central venous catheter and peripheral venous samples in 48 patients with cancer. Asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis was identified via Doppler ultrasound. Bland and Altman’s limits of agreement analysis was used to compare sample sites. Sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer was calculated. Results Overall, 33 of the central samples and 32 of the peripheral samples had D-dimer levels below the cutoff (≥0.3 mg/l). Mean central D-dimer was 0.31 ± 0.35 mg/l; peripheral 0.24 ± 0.22 mg/l (p = 0.5). Bland–Altman plot showed that the two sample sites were not equivalent. Catheter-related thrombosis was demonstrated in five patients, and there were three false negatives. Peripheral D-dimer had a negative predictive value of 90.9%. Conclusions A negative D-dimer may be useful for screening asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in patients with cancer, but the central and peripheral sample sites are not equivalent.
ISSN:0268-3555
1758-1125
DOI:10.1177/0268355518772171