Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins

Objectives It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phlebology 2016-09, Vol.31 (8), p.546-553
Hauptverfasser: Lattimer, Christopher R, Kalodiki, Evi, Mendoza, Erika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 553
container_issue 8
container_start_page 546
container_title Phlebology
container_volume 31
creator Lattimer, Christopher R
Kalodiki, Evi
Mendoza, Erika
description Objectives It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this hypothesis. A dependency to elevation manoeuvre was used to provoke gravitational venous drainage. A rapid reduction in calf volume implied good drainage. Methods This was a single centre, proof-of-concept study comparing gravitational venous drainage in varicose vein patients and controls. Leg filling and drainage manoeuvres (elevation to dependency and dependency to elevation) were performed three times per leg in 15 patients (7 male, 8 right) and 16 controls (3 male, 8 right). The VDI was measured in the same way the established venous filling index (VFI) is calculated to quantify filling: VDI = 90% of venous drainage volume (90VDV)/90% venous drainage time (VDT90). Results The patients were significantly older at 58 (41–75) years versus the controls 47 (18–58), p = 0.001. There was no significant difference between the groups in weight, height, BMI or common femoral vein diameter. The patients were (C2 = 8; C3 = 1, C4 = 6), VCSS 4 (1–11) with a median refluxing proximal thigh saphenous diameter of 6 (5–11) mm. The median (inter-quartile range) VFI and VDI (both in mL/s) in the control tests (n = 48) were 1.3 (0.9–1.9) and 33.8 (21.5–55), respectively. The VFI and VDI in the patient tests (n = 41) were significantly faster at 6.2 (3.5–9.4), p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0268355515604256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0268355515604256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0268355515604256</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0268355515604256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f492f095cc9d924b845d3e7c024845315acd2d258633298509f19b6b8b45b7af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlbvniR_YDWfm-QoRatQ8GLPSzab1JQ2WzLbSv-9KVUPgqcZmPd5GR6Ebim5p1SpB8JqzaWUVNZEMFmfoTFVUleUMnmOxsdzdbyP0BXAihDClFKXaMRqzrUWbIwWs2z3cbBD7JNd471P_Q5wl21MdulxBAxxmWKIzqZhfcDBwuAzjglvC-PTAPgzDh94b3N0PfjSEBNco4tg1-BvvucELZ6f3qcv1fxt9jp9nFeOczVUQRgWiJHOmc4w0WohO-6VI0yUlVNpXcc6JnV5lxktiQnUtHWrWyFbZQOfIHLqdbkHyD402xw3Nh8aSpqjoeavoYLcnZDtrt347hf4UVIC1SkARUCz6ne5iIH_C78A9VJuaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Lattimer, Christopher R ; Kalodiki, Evi ; Mendoza, Erika</creator><creatorcontrib>Lattimer, Christopher R ; Kalodiki, Evi ; Mendoza, Erika</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this hypothesis. A dependency to elevation manoeuvre was used to provoke gravitational venous drainage. A rapid reduction in calf volume implied good drainage. Methods This was a single centre, proof-of-concept study comparing gravitational venous drainage in varicose vein patients and controls. Leg filling and drainage manoeuvres (elevation to dependency and dependency to elevation) were performed three times per leg in 15 patients (7 male, 8 right) and 16 controls (3 male, 8 right). The VDI was measured in the same way the established venous filling index (VFI) is calculated to quantify filling: VDI = 90% of venous drainage volume (90VDV)/90% venous drainage time (VDT90). Results The patients were significantly older at 58 (41–75) years versus the controls 47 (18–58), p = 0.001. There was no significant difference between the groups in weight, height, BMI or common femoral vein diameter. The patients were (C2 = 8; C3 = 1, C4 = 6), VCSS 4 (1–11) with a median refluxing proximal thigh saphenous diameter of 6 (5–11) mm. The median (inter-quartile range) VFI and VDI (both in mL/s) in the control tests (n = 48) were 1.3 (0.9–1.9) and 33.8 (21.5–55), respectively. The VFI and VDI in the patient tests (n = 41) were significantly faster at 6.2 (3.5–9.4), p &lt; 0.0005, and 47.1 (36.1–66.3), p = 0.002, respectively. Adjusted to a standard mean for each leg, the reproducibility limits (×3) of the VDI was very good at 39.7 (95% CI: 36.5–42.9) in controls and 52.9 (95% CI: 49.7–56.1) in patients. Conclusion The VDI was significantly greater in patients with varicose veins compared to controls. It is unlikely that impeded gravitational drainage is a significant factor in the pathophysiology of varicose veins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0268355515604256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26338842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Femoral Vein - pathology ; Femoral Vein - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proof of Concept Study ; Varicose Veins - pathology ; Varicose Veins - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Phlebology, 2016-09, Vol.31 (8), p.546-553</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f492f095cc9d924b845d3e7c024845315acd2d258633298509f19b6b8b45b7af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f492f095cc9d924b845d3e7c024845315acd2d258633298509f19b6b8b45b7af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0268355515604256$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268355515604256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26338842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lattimer, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalodiki, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Erika</creatorcontrib><title>Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins</title><title>Phlebology</title><addtitle>Phlebology</addtitle><description>Objectives It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this hypothesis. A dependency to elevation manoeuvre was used to provoke gravitational venous drainage. A rapid reduction in calf volume implied good drainage. Methods This was a single centre, proof-of-concept study comparing gravitational venous drainage in varicose vein patients and controls. Leg filling and drainage manoeuvres (elevation to dependency and dependency to elevation) were performed three times per leg in 15 patients (7 male, 8 right) and 16 controls (3 male, 8 right). The VDI was measured in the same way the established venous filling index (VFI) is calculated to quantify filling: VDI = 90% of venous drainage volume (90VDV)/90% venous drainage time (VDT90). Results The patients were significantly older at 58 (41–75) years versus the controls 47 (18–58), p = 0.001. There was no significant difference between the groups in weight, height, BMI or common femoral vein diameter. The patients were (C2 = 8; C3 = 1, C4 = 6), VCSS 4 (1–11) with a median refluxing proximal thigh saphenous diameter of 6 (5–11) mm. The median (inter-quartile range) VFI and VDI (both in mL/s) in the control tests (n = 48) were 1.3 (0.9–1.9) and 33.8 (21.5–55), respectively. The VFI and VDI in the patient tests (n = 41) were significantly faster at 6.2 (3.5–9.4), p &lt; 0.0005, and 47.1 (36.1–66.3), p = 0.002, respectively. Adjusted to a standard mean for each leg, the reproducibility limits (×3) of the VDI was very good at 39.7 (95% CI: 36.5–42.9) in controls and 52.9 (95% CI: 49.7–56.1) in patients. Conclusion The VDI was significantly greater in patients with varicose veins compared to controls. It is unlikely that impeded gravitational drainage is a significant factor in the pathophysiology of varicose veins.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - pathology</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Proof of Concept Study</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - pathology</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - physiopathology</subject><issn>0268-3555</issn><issn>1758-1125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlbvniR_YDWfm-QoRatQ8GLPSzab1JQ2WzLbSv-9KVUPgqcZmPd5GR6Ebim5p1SpB8JqzaWUVNZEMFmfoTFVUleUMnmOxsdzdbyP0BXAihDClFKXaMRqzrUWbIwWs2z3cbBD7JNd471P_Q5wl21MdulxBAxxmWKIzqZhfcDBwuAzjglvC-PTAPgzDh94b3N0PfjSEBNco4tg1-BvvucELZ6f3qcv1fxt9jp9nFeOczVUQRgWiJHOmc4w0WohO-6VI0yUlVNpXcc6JnV5lxktiQnUtHWrWyFbZQOfIHLqdbkHyD402xw3Nh8aSpqjoeavoYLcnZDtrt347hf4UVIC1SkARUCz6ne5iIH_C78A9VJuaA</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Lattimer, Christopher R</creator><creator>Kalodiki, Evi</creator><creator>Mendoza, Erika</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins</title><author>Lattimer, Christopher R ; Kalodiki, Evi ; Mendoza, Erika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f492f095cc9d924b845d3e7c024845315acd2d258633298509f19b6b8b45b7af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - pathology</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Proof of Concept Study</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - pathology</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lattimer, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalodiki, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Erika</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Phlebology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lattimer, Christopher R</au><au>Kalodiki, Evi</au><au>Mendoza, Erika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins</atitle><jtitle>Phlebology</jtitle><addtitle>Phlebology</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>546-553</pages><issn>0268-3555</issn><eissn>1758-1125</eissn><abstract>Objectives It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this hypothesis. A dependency to elevation manoeuvre was used to provoke gravitational venous drainage. A rapid reduction in calf volume implied good drainage. Methods This was a single centre, proof-of-concept study comparing gravitational venous drainage in varicose vein patients and controls. Leg filling and drainage manoeuvres (elevation to dependency and dependency to elevation) were performed three times per leg in 15 patients (7 male, 8 right) and 16 controls (3 male, 8 right). The VDI was measured in the same way the established venous filling index (VFI) is calculated to quantify filling: VDI = 90% of venous drainage volume (90VDV)/90% venous drainage time (VDT90). Results The patients were significantly older at 58 (41–75) years versus the controls 47 (18–58), p = 0.001. There was no significant difference between the groups in weight, height, BMI or common femoral vein diameter. The patients were (C2 = 8; C3 = 1, C4 = 6), VCSS 4 (1–11) with a median refluxing proximal thigh saphenous diameter of 6 (5–11) mm. The median (inter-quartile range) VFI and VDI (both in mL/s) in the control tests (n = 48) were 1.3 (0.9–1.9) and 33.8 (21.5–55), respectively. The VFI and VDI in the patient tests (n = 41) were significantly faster at 6.2 (3.5–9.4), p &lt; 0.0005, and 47.1 (36.1–66.3), p = 0.002, respectively. Adjusted to a standard mean for each leg, the reproducibility limits (×3) of the VDI was very good at 39.7 (95% CI: 36.5–42.9) in controls and 52.9 (95% CI: 49.7–56.1) in patients. Conclusion The VDI was significantly greater in patients with varicose veins compared to controls. It is unlikely that impeded gravitational drainage is a significant factor in the pathophysiology of varicose veins.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26338842</pmid><doi>10.1177/0268355515604256</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3555
ispartof Phlebology, 2016-09, Vol.31 (8), p.546-553
issn 0268-3555
1758-1125
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0268355515604256
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Female
Femoral Vein - pathology
Femoral Vein - physiopathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Proof of Concept Study
Varicose Veins - pathology
Varicose Veins - physiopathology
title Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gravitational%20venous%20drainage%20is%20significantly%20faster%20in%20patients%20with%20varicose%20veins&rft.jtitle=Phlebology&rft.au=Lattimer,%20Christopher%20R&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=546-553&rft.issn=0268-3555&rft.eissn=1758-1125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0268355515604256&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0268355515604256%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26338842&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0268355515604256&rfr_iscdi=true