Gravitational venous drainage is significantly faster in patients with varicose veins
Objectives It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Phlebology 2016-09, Vol.31 (8), p.546-553 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
It has been proposed that varicose veins may be caused by a degree of impeded proximal venous drainage (pelvic venous obstruction) in the same way that biological tubes dilate in response to an obstruction. The venous drainage index (VDI) of air-plethysmography (APG) was used to test this hypothesis. A dependency to elevation manoeuvre was used to provoke gravitational venous drainage. A rapid reduction in calf volume implied good drainage.
Methods
This was a single centre, proof-of-concept study comparing gravitational venous drainage in varicose vein patients and controls. Leg filling and drainage manoeuvres (elevation to dependency and dependency to elevation) were performed three times per leg in 15 patients (7 male, 8 right) and 16 controls (3 male, 8 right). The VDI was measured in the same way the established venous filling index (VFI) is calculated to quantify filling: VDI = 90% of venous drainage volume (90VDV)/90% venous drainage time (VDT90).
Results
The patients were significantly older at 58 (41–75) years versus the controls 47 (18–58), p = 0.001. There was no significant difference between the groups in weight, height, BMI or common femoral vein diameter. The patients were (C2 = 8; C3 = 1, C4 = 6), VCSS 4 (1–11) with a median refluxing proximal thigh saphenous diameter of 6 (5–11) mm. The median (inter-quartile range) VFI and VDI (both in mL/s) in the control tests (n = 48) were 1.3 (0.9–1.9) and 33.8 (21.5–55), respectively. The VFI and VDI in the patient tests (n = 41) were significantly faster at 6.2 (3.5–9.4), p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-3555 1758-1125 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0268355515604256 |