Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device
This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor. In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a co...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Diabetes educator 2004-03, Vol.30 (2), p.301-308 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 308 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 301 |
| container_title | The Diabetes educator |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Bode, Bruce Shelmet, John Gooch, Brent Hassman, David R. Liang, John Smedegaard, Jorgen K. Skovlund, Soren Berg, Birgitte Lyness, William Schneider, Stephen H. |
| description | This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor.
In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a combined injector/monitor device or syringes, a vial, and a separate glucose monitor, then switched to the alternate treatment. Efficacy, safety, preference, satisfaction, and actual use (via meter download) of the 2 systems were compared.
Most of the patients preferred using the combination device to syringes and a separate meter. Results from the Handling of Delivery Systems questionnaire given at the end of the study indicated that 49% of patients felt they tested their blood glucose more often with the combination device than with a separate meter. A higher frequency of daily monitoring was reported with the combination device in patients overall (approximately 1 more reading per week). However, a large subset of patients (32%) showed substantial increases in their frequency of daily glucose monitoring (an average of 1 additional reading per day).
Use of the combination device was associated with significant improvements in patient treatment satisfaction. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/014572170403000223 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_014572170403000223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_014572170403000223</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_014572170403000223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-61a8a2c27d544a4ca48146139120d0fd73fb604a7eff8e749734b5b974c4a5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMobk7_gA_SP1B3k9w07aNMnYOJE-ZzSdNEWrZkJK3gv7dlAx8En8693O8cuIeQWwr3lEo5B4pCMioBgQMAY_yMTKkQmGaQ8XMyHYF0JCbkKsYWgAss8ksyoQIKIRhMyftGdY1xXbIxQZtD13iXKFcnH9Ek3g5jsnKx3zWjtkZ3PsyXu1774fzqXTPsycLvq8aZOnk0X4021-TCql00Nyedke3z03bxkq7flqvFwzrVHGmXZlTlimkma4GoUCvMKWaUF5RBDbaW3FYZoJLG2txILCTHSlSFRI1KaD4j7Birg48xGFseQrNX4bukUI71lH_rGUx3R9Ohr_am_rWc-hiA-RGI6tOUre-DG374L_IH4npsLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bode, Bruce ; Shelmet, John ; Gooch, Brent ; Hassman, David R. ; Liang, John ; Smedegaard, Jorgen K. ; Skovlund, Soren ; Berg, Birgitte ; Lyness, William ; Schneider, Stephen H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce ; Shelmet, John ; Gooch, Brent ; Hassman, David R. ; Liang, John ; Smedegaard, Jorgen K. ; Skovlund, Soren ; Berg, Birgitte ; Lyness, William ; Schneider, Stephen H. ; InDuo Study Group ; InDuo Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor.
In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a combined injector/monitor device or syringes, a vial, and a separate glucose monitor, then switched to the alternate treatment. Efficacy, safety, preference, satisfaction, and actual use (via meter download) of the 2 systems were compared.
Most of the patients preferred using the combination device to syringes and a separate meter. Results from the Handling of Delivery Systems questionnaire given at the end of the study indicated that 49% of patients felt they tested their blood glucose more often with the combination device than with a separate meter. A higher frequency of daily monitoring was reported with the combination device in patients overall (approximately 1 more reading per week). However, a large subset of patients (32%) showed substantial increases in their frequency of daily glucose monitoring (an average of 1 additional reading per day).
Use of the combination device was associated with significant improvements in patient treatment satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-6063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014572170403000223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15095520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude to Health ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - adverse effects ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - psychology ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - metabolism ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage ; Injections, Subcutaneous - adverse effects ; Injections, Subcutaneous - instrumentation ; Injections, Subcutaneous - psychology ; Insulin - administration & dosage ; Male ; Safety ; Self Administration - instrumentation ; Self Administration - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Diabetes educator, 2004-03, Vol.30 (2), p.301-308</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-61a8a2c27d544a4ca48146139120d0fd73fb604a7eff8e749734b5b974c4a5c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014572170403000223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014572170403000223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15095520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelmet, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassman, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smedegaard, Jorgen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skovlund, Soren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyness, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>InDuo Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>InDuo Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device</title><title>The Diabetes educator</title><addtitle>Diabetes Educ</addtitle><description>This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor.
In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a combined injector/monitor device or syringes, a vial, and a separate glucose monitor, then switched to the alternate treatment. Efficacy, safety, preference, satisfaction, and actual use (via meter download) of the 2 systems were compared.
Most of the patients preferred using the combination device to syringes and a separate meter. Results from the Handling of Delivery Systems questionnaire given at the end of the study indicated that 49% of patients felt they tested their blood glucose more often with the combination device than with a separate meter. A higher frequency of daily monitoring was reported with the combination device in patients overall (approximately 1 more reading per week). However, a large subset of patients (32%) showed substantial increases in their frequency of daily glucose monitoring (an average of 1 additional reading per day).
Use of the combination device was associated with significant improvements in patient treatment satisfaction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - psychology</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - metabolism</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - psychology</subject><subject>Insulin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Self Administration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Self Administration - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0145-7217</issn><issn>1554-6063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMobk7_gA_SP1B3k9w07aNMnYOJE-ZzSdNEWrZkJK3gv7dlAx8En8693O8cuIeQWwr3lEo5B4pCMioBgQMAY_yMTKkQmGaQ8XMyHYF0JCbkKsYWgAss8ksyoQIKIRhMyftGdY1xXbIxQZtD13iXKFcnH9Ek3g5jsnKx3zWjtkZ3PsyXu1774fzqXTPsycLvq8aZOnk0X4021-TCql00Nyedke3z03bxkq7flqvFwzrVHGmXZlTlimkma4GoUCvMKWaUF5RBDbaW3FYZoJLG2txILCTHSlSFRI1KaD4j7Birg48xGFseQrNX4bukUI71lH_rGUx3R9Ohr_am_rWc-hiA-RGI6tOUre-DG374L_IH4npsLg</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Bode, Bruce</creator><creator>Shelmet, John</creator><creator>Gooch, Brent</creator><creator>Hassman, David R.</creator><creator>Liang, John</creator><creator>Smedegaard, Jorgen K.</creator><creator>Skovlund, Soren</creator><creator>Berg, Birgitte</creator><creator>Lyness, William</creator><creator>Schneider, Stephen H.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device</title><author>Bode, Bruce ; Shelmet, John ; Gooch, Brent ; Hassman, David R. ; Liang, John ; Smedegaard, Jorgen K. ; Skovlund, Soren ; Berg, Birgitte ; Lyness, William ; Schneider, Stephen H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-61a8a2c27d544a4ca48146139120d0fd73fb604a7eff8e749734b5b974c4a5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - psychology</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - metabolism</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - psychology</topic><topic>Insulin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Self Administration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Self Administration - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelmet, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooch, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassman, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smedegaard, Jorgen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skovlund, Soren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyness, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>InDuo Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>InDuo Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Diabetes educator</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bode, Bruce</au><au>Shelmet, John</au><au>Gooch, Brent</au><au>Hassman, David R.</au><au>Liang, John</au><au>Smedegaard, Jorgen K.</au><au>Skovlund, Soren</au><au>Berg, Birgitte</au><au>Lyness, William</au><au>Schneider, Stephen H.</au><aucorp>InDuo Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>InDuo Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device</atitle><jtitle>The Diabetes educator</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Educ</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>301-308</pages><issn>0145-7217</issn><eissn>1554-6063</eissn><abstract>This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor.
In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a combined injector/monitor device or syringes, a vial, and a separate glucose monitor, then switched to the alternate treatment. Efficacy, safety, preference, satisfaction, and actual use (via meter download) of the 2 systems were compared.
Most of the patients preferred using the combination device to syringes and a separate meter. Results from the Handling of Delivery Systems questionnaire given at the end of the study indicated that 49% of patients felt they tested their blood glucose more often with the combination device than with a separate meter. A higher frequency of daily monitoring was reported with the combination device in patients overall (approximately 1 more reading per week). However, a large subset of patients (32%) showed substantial increases in their frequency of daily glucose monitoring (an average of 1 additional reading per day).
Use of the combination device was associated with significant improvements in patient treatment satisfaction.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>15095520</pmid><doi>10.1177/014572170403000223</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0145-7217 |
| ispartof | The Diabetes educator, 2004-03, Vol.30 (2), p.301-308 |
| issn | 0145-7217 1554-6063 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_014572170403000223 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Attitude to Health Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - adverse effects Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - psychology Cross-Over Studies Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - metabolism Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - psychology Equipment Design Female Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage Injections, Subcutaneous - adverse effects Injections, Subcutaneous - instrumentation Injections, Subcutaneous - psychology Insulin - administration & dosage Male Safety Self Administration - instrumentation Self Administration - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires United States |
| title | Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Perception%20and%20Use%20of%20an%20Insulin%20Injector/Glucose%20Monitor%20Combined%20Device&rft.jtitle=The%20Diabetes%20educator&rft.au=Bode,%20Bruce&rft.aucorp=InDuo%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=301-308&rft.issn=0145-7217&rft.eissn=1554-6063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014572170403000223&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_014572170403000223%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15095520&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014572170403000223&rfr_iscdi=true |