Patient Perception and Use of an Insulin Injector/Glucose Monitor Combined Device

This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor. In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Diabetes educator 2004-03, Vol.30 (2), p.301-308
Hauptverfasser: Bode, Bruce, Shelmet, John, Gooch, Brent, Hassman, David R., Liang, John, Smedegaard, Jorgen K., Skovlund, Soren, Berg, Birgitte, Lyness, William, Schneider, Stephen H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and use of an insulin injector/glucose monitor combination device versus syringes and a separate glucose monitor. In a randomized, multicenter, 2-period crossover study, 15 patients with type 1 diabetes were randomized to use either a combined injector/monitor device or syringes, a vial, and a separate glucose monitor, then switched to the alternate treatment. Efficacy, safety, preference, satisfaction, and actual use (via meter download) of the 2 systems were compared. Most of the patients preferred using the combination device to syringes and a separate meter. Results from the Handling of Delivery Systems questionnaire given at the end of the study indicated that 49% of patients felt they tested their blood glucose more often with the combination device than with a separate meter. A higher frequency of daily monitoring was reported with the combination device in patients overall (approximately 1 more reading per week). However, a large subset of patients (32%) showed substantial increases in their frequency of daily glucose monitoring (an average of 1 additional reading per day). Use of the combination device was associated with significant improvements in patient treatment satisfaction.
ISSN:0145-7217
1554-6063
DOI:10.1177/014572170403000223