Detecting Adverse Drug Reactions in Postmarketing Surveillance: Interview Validity

As part of a large-scale study developing new methods of postmarketing surveillance, computer-assisted interview information was collected from 231 outpatients receiving a target drug chosen from two pharmacological classes (antibiotics and tricyclic antidepressants) for which adverse drug reactions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug information journal 1987-04, Vol.21 (2), p.173-183
Hauptverfasser: Fisher, Seymour, Bryant, Stephen G., Kluge, Ronica M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As part of a large-scale study developing new methods of postmarketing surveillance, computer-assisted interview information was collected from 231 outpatients receiving a target drug chosen from two pharmacological classes (antibiotics and tricyclic antidepressants) for which adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are well-documented. The standardized telephone interview used to describe and quantify all adverse clinical events (ACEs) has some questions that focus only on spontaneously reported ACEs and other detailed questions covering various specific organ systems. Analyses show that spontaneously reported ACEs generally provide the most reliable source of true ADRs. The results have important implications bearing upon the ease with which a set of ACEs may be inappropriately interpreted as possible adverse drug reactions.
ISSN:2168-4790
0092-8615
2168-4804
DOI:10.1177/009286158702100210