Cognitive Phenomenology of Religious Experience in Religious Narratives, Dreams, and Nightmares

McNamara (2009) hypothesized that a 4-step sequential decentering process (diminished agency, liminality, effort, and success) characterized the phenomenology of religious and spiritual experiences (rses) and was rooted in dreams and nightmares. We content analyzed 50 rses, 50 dreams, and 50 nightma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archive for the psychology of religion 2015-01, Vol.37 (3), p.343-357
Hauptverfasser: McNamara, Patrick, Minsky, April, Pae, Victoria, Gusev, Alina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:McNamara (2009) hypothesized that a 4-step sequential decentering process (diminished agency, liminality, effort, and success) characterized the phenomenology of religious and spiritual experiences (rses) and was rooted in dreams and nightmares. We content analyzed 50 rses, 50 dreams, and 50 nightmares for presence and ordering of elements of the decentering process. Thirty-six percent of rses, 48% of dreams, and 44% of nightmares had all four decentering elements. The sense of success occurred most frequently in rses (11% of all decentering instances) and least frequently in nightmares (5%). Conversely, diminishment of agency occurred least often in rses (7% of all decentering instances) and most often in nightmares (10%). For rses 66% of instances of effort occurred, as hypothesized, after liminality and diminishment. We conclude that an orderly 4-step decentering process is reliably detectable in many, but not all, rses, and that randomly ordered decentering elements occur abundantly in dreams and nightmares.
ISSN:0084-6724
1573-6121
DOI:10.1163/15736121-12341311