Funny and scary in children’s narratives: cognitive aspect

Background. _e study of the funny and the scary in the children’s subculture, described in the article by E.O. Smirnova and A.L. Romanova, allows us to consider these phenomena as the reverse side and an integral part of mastering culture, to see the dialectics of development. Objective. _e aim of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nat͡s︡ionalʹnyĭ psikhologicheskiĭ zhurnal 2023, Vol.47 (3), p.44-51
1. Verfasser: Shiyan, Olga A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. _e study of the funny and the scary in the children’s subculture, described in the article by E.O. Smirnova and A.L. Romanova, allows us to consider these phenomena as the reverse side and an integral part of mastering culture, to see the dialectics of development. Objective. _e aim of the study is to analyse the cognitive mechanisms used to overcome fear on the basis of children’s narratives. Sample. _e study involved 57 children aged 6 to 6.5 years from two kindergartens (Moscow). Methods. _e empirical study was carried out with the author’s methodology “Non-scary story”: the children were asked to compose a story about a scary character, though the story itself ought to have been not scary. _e study was conducted in preschool groups,contrasted by the parameter of education quality. _e quality of education was assessed with the ECERS-3 (educational environment assessment scales) and the scales for assessing the conditions for the development of creative abilities, developed and tested in the Laboratory of Child Development at Moscow City University. Results. Among the ways to overcome the scary in children’s stories, two major ways can be noted. _e `rst one is turning a scary character into a non-scary one, and the second one is creating ambivalent characters that combine opposites of the scary and the funny. In both cases, dialectical thinking is the cognitive mechanism which makes it possible for a child to operate with opposites and to reaect situations of contradiction and development. In the stories of children from the group with higher quality of education, ambivalent characters were found twice as oben as in the other group (according to Student’s t-test, the dicerences are signi`cant at the level of 0.05), which may indicate a connection between the quality of educational process and child development. Conclusion. Solving the problem of overcoming fear when writing a narrative, children can use dialectical thinking — in particular, the actions of transformation and mediation (in ambivalent images combining opposites in themselves). It can be assumed that such symbolic activity as story creation acts as scacolding1 for implementation and development of dialectical structures in preschool age.
ISSN:2079-6617
2309-9828
DOI:10.11621/npj.2022.0306