Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TEMPLATE (Ticagrelor Monotherapy and Platelet Reactivity) Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: To assess differences in platelet inhibition during ticagrelor monotherapy (TIC) or dual therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin (TIC+ASP) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention using a comprehensive panel of functional tests. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center parallel gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Heart Association 2020-12, Vol.9 (24), p.e016495, Article 016495
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Thomas W., Baos, Sarah, Collett, Laura, Hutchinson, James L., Nkau, Martin, Molina, Maria, Aungraheeta, Riyaad, Reilly-Stitt, Christopher, Bowles, Ruth, Reeves, Barnaby C., Rogers, Chris A., Mundell, Stuart J., Baumbach, Andreas, Mumford, Andrew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: To assess differences in platelet inhibition during ticagrelor monotherapy (TIC) or dual therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin (TIC+ASP) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention using a comprehensive panel of functional tests. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center parallel group, open label, randomized controlled trial, 110 participants were randomized to receive either TIC (n=55) or TIC+ASP (n=55) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the platelet aggregation response with 10 mu mol/L thrombin receptor activation peptide-6 (TRAP-6). The secondary outcomes were platelet aggregation responses and binding of surface activation markers with a panel of other activators. The mean percentage aggregation for 10 mu mol/L TRAP-6 was similar for the TIC and TIC+ASP groups (mean difference+4.29; 95% CI, -0.87 to +9.46). Aggregation was higher in the TIC group compared with the TIC+ASP group with 1 mu g/mL (+6.47; +2.04 to +10.90) and 0.5 mu g/mL (+14.00; +7.63 to +20.39) collagen related peptide. Aggregation responses with 5 mu mol/L TRAP-6, 5 mu mol/L or 2.5 mu mol/L thromboxane A(2) receptor agonist and surface activation marker binding with 5 mu mol/L TRAP-6 or 0.5 mu g/mL collagen related peptide were the same between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PCI show similar levels of inhibition of most platelet activation pathways with TIC compared with dual therapy with TIC + ASP. However, the greater aggregation response with collagen related peptide during TIC indicates incomplete inhibition of glycoprotein VI (collagen) receptor-mediated platelet activation. This difference in pharmacodynamic response to anti-platelet medication may contribute to the lower bleeding rates observed with TIC compared with dual antiplatelet therapy in recent clinical trials.
ISSN:2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.016495