Identifying the Infarct-Related Artery in Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND:Determining the infarct-related artery (IRA) in non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (MI) can be challenging. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) can accurately identify small MIs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DE-CMR improves the ability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2019-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e007305-e007305
Hauptverfasser: Heitner, John F, Senthilkumar, Annamalai, Harrison, J Kevin, Klem, Igor, Sketch, Michael H, Ivanov, Alexandr, Hamo, Carine, Van Assche, Lowie, White, James, Washam, Jeffrey, Patel, Manesh R, Bekkers, Sebastiaan C.A.M, Smulders, Martijn W, Sacchi, Terrence J, Kim, Raymond J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Determining the infarct-related artery (IRA) in non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (MI) can be challenging. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) can accurately identify small MIs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DE-CMR improves the ability to identify the IRA in patients with non–ST-segment–elevation MI. METHODS AND RESULTS:In this 3-center, prospective study, we enrolled 114 patients presenting with their first MI. Patients underwent DE-CMR followed by coronary angiography. The interventional cardiologist was blinded to the DE-CMR results. Later, coronary angiography and DE-CMR images were reviewed independently and blindly for identification of the IRA. The pattern of DE-CMR hyperenhancement was also used to determine whether there was a nonischemic pathogenesis for myocardial necrosis. The IRA was not identifiable by coronary angiography in 37% of patients (n=42). In these, the IRA or a new noncoronary artery disease diagnosis was identified by DE-CMR in 60% and 19% of patients, respectively. Even in patients with an IRA determined by coronary angiography, a different IRA or a noncoronary artery disease diagnosis was identified by DE-CMR in 14% and 13%, respectively. Overall, DE-CMR led to a new IRA diagnosis in 31%, a diagnosis of nonischemic pathogenesis in 15%, or either in 46% (95% CI, 37%–55%) of patients. Of 55 patients undergoing revascularization, 27% had revascularization solely to nonculprit coronary artery territories as determined by DE-CMR. CONCLUSIONS:Identification of the IRA by coronary angiography can be challenging in patients with non–ST-segment–elevation MI. In nearly half, DE-CMR may lead to a new IRA diagnosis or elucidate a nonischemic pathogenesis. Revascularization solely of coronary arteries that are believed to be nonculprit arteries by DE-CMR is not uncommon.
ISSN:1941-7640
1941-7632
DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007305