Diagnostic Value of the Air-Bone Threshold Gap in Stapes Fixation

Introduction: The Carhart notch is a well-known sign of stapes fixation. However, previous studies have reported that the Carhart notch is not specific to stapes fixation and is also present in other middle ear diseases. Therefore, this study investigated the diagnostic value of threshold gap betwee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Audiology & neurotology 2023-08, Vol.28 (4), p.255-261
Hauptverfasser: Cheon, Dongchul, Kim, Dachan, Kim, Sung Huhn, Choi, Jae Young, Bae, Seong Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: The Carhart notch is a well-known sign of stapes fixation. However, previous studies have reported that the Carhart notch is not specific to stapes fixation and is also present in other middle ear diseases. Therefore, this study investigated the diagnostic value of threshold gap between air conduction and bone conduction (ABG) for stapes fixation, instead of the bone conduction dip representing the Carhart notch. Methods: A total of 199 ears that underwent exploratory tympanotomy were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were categorized into three groups according to surgical findings: stapes fixation (SF), other ossicle fixation (OF), and chain disconnection (CD). Preoperative pure-tone audiograms and impedance audiograms were compared between the groups. Results: The incidence of the Carhart notch did not differ between the groups. The ABG at 2,000 Hz showed a good diagnostic performance for distinguishing between the SF and CD groups (area under the curve, AUC = 0.816, p < 0.001), but poor performance for distinguishing between the SF and OF groups (AUC = 0.662, p = 0.003). Bone conduction at 2,000 Hz showed a moderate performance for distinguishing between the SF and CD groups (AUC = 0.707, p < 0.001) and did not show statistically significant results for distinguishing between the SF and OF groups (AUC = 0.594, p = 0.080). The tympanic membrane compliance was significantly higher in the CD group than in the SF group (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The Carhart notch was not a specific finding of SF. The sensitivity and specificity of ABG ≤15 dB at 2,000 Hz for distinguishing between SF and CD were 60.4% and 89.2%, respectively. To prepare for surgical interventions in patients with conductive hearing loss but a normal tympanic membrane, clinicians should comprehensively consider these results.
ISSN:1420-3030
1421-9700
DOI:10.1159/000528826