A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease
Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery 2021-05, Vol.99 (3), p.230-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Engelhardt, Julien Caire, François Damon-Perrière, Nathalie Guehl, Dominique Branchard, Olivier Auzou, Nicolas Tison, François Meissner, Wassilios G. Krim, Elsa Bannier, Stéphanie Bénard, Antoine Sitta, Rémi Fontaine, Denys Hoarau, Xavier Burbaud, Pierre Cuny, Emmanuel |
description | Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess the motor outcomes of asleep DBS. Leads were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) according to probabilistic stereotactic coordinates with a surgical robot under O-arm © imaging guidance under either general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings (MER) (20 patients, asleep group) or local anesthesia with MER and clinical testing (9 patients, awake group). Results: The mean motor improvement rates on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-3) between OFF and ON stimulation without medication were 52.3% (95% CI: 45.4–59.2%) in the asleep group and 47.0% (95% CI: 23.8–70.2%) in the awake group, 6 months after surgery. Except for a subcutaneous hematoma, we did not observe any complications related to the surgery. Three patients (33%) in the awake group and 8 in the asleep group (40%) had at least one side effect potentially linked with neurostimulation. Conclusions: Owing to its randomized design, our study supports the hypothesis that motor outcomes after asleep STN-DBS in PD may be noninferior to the standard awake procedure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000511424 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000511424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2466037969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb281beb4231d236363db4e9ceba2ac4ed8f06ccd20f25b8340f815e79e136d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkclOwzAQhi0EglI4cOfgIxwC3rIdQ1mKVEHFco4cZwKmSVzspAhOvAavx5PgqlXRHGY08-mfDaEjSs4oDdNzQkhIqWBiCw284wHhMdv2MaE0iCgL99C-c28e4yJOdtEe5ywUNGYDtMjw9FU6wAw_yLY0jf6CEj9ZLWtsKpy5GmCOF2Bd73D2IWeAH_uie5W1bLTCd72qwVcul9SFlbrFj51u-lp22rS4MhZPpZ3p1pn29_vHg9qBb3eAdipZOzhc-yF6vr56Go2Dyf3N7SibBIqHrAuKgiW0gMLvREvGI29lISBVUEgmlYAyqUikVMlIxcIi4YJUCQ0hToHyqCR8iE5Xun7gfG51I-1nbqTOx9kkX-aIECIlcbignj1ZsXNr3ntwXd5op6CuZQumdzkTUeQPm0bpv6yyxjkL1Uabknz5knzzEs8er9iZtC9gN-S6_AcTgYVP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466037969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease</title><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Engelhardt, Julien ; Caire, François ; Damon-Perrière, Nathalie ; Guehl, Dominique ; Branchard, Olivier ; Auzou, Nicolas ; Tison, François ; Meissner, Wassilios G. ; Krim, Elsa ; Bannier, Stéphanie ; Bénard, Antoine ; Sitta, Rémi ; Fontaine, Denys ; Hoarau, Xavier ; Burbaud, Pierre ; Cuny, Emmanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Julien ; Caire, François ; Damon-Perrière, Nathalie ; Guehl, Dominique ; Branchard, Olivier ; Auzou, Nicolas ; Tison, François ; Meissner, Wassilios G. ; Krim, Elsa ; Bannier, Stéphanie ; Bénard, Antoine ; Sitta, Rémi ; Fontaine, Denys ; Hoarau, Xavier ; Burbaud, Pierre ; Cuny, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess the motor outcomes of asleep DBS. Leads were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) according to probabilistic stereotactic coordinates with a surgical robot under O-arm © imaging guidance under either general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings (MER) (20 patients, asleep group) or local anesthesia with MER and clinical testing (9 patients, awake group). Results: The mean motor improvement rates on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-3) between OFF and ON stimulation without medication were 52.3% (95% CI: 45.4–59.2%) in the asleep group and 47.0% (95% CI: 23.8–70.2%) in the awake group, 6 months after surgery. Except for a subcutaneous hematoma, we did not observe any complications related to the surgery. Three patients (33%) in the awake group and 8 in the asleep group (40%) had at least one side effect potentially linked with neurostimulation. Conclusions: Owing to its randomized design, our study supports the hypothesis that motor outcomes after asleep STN-DBS in PD may be noninferior to the standard awake procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-6125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000511424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33254172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: Karger</publisher><subject>Clinical Study ; Cognitive science ; Neuroscience</subject><ispartof>Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2021-05, Vol.99 (3), p.230-240</ispartof><rights>2020 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb281beb4231d236363db4e9ceba2ac4ed8f06ccd20f25b8340f815e79e136d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb281beb4231d236363db4e9ceba2ac4ed8f06ccd20f25b8340f815e79e136d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2423,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04449075$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caire, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damon-Perrière, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guehl, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branchard, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auzou, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tison, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meissner, Wassilios G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krim, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannier, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bénard, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitta, Rémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Denys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoarau, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burbaud, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuny, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><title>A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease</title><title>Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess the motor outcomes of asleep DBS. Leads were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) according to probabilistic stereotactic coordinates with a surgical robot under O-arm © imaging guidance under either general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings (MER) (20 patients, asleep group) or local anesthesia with MER and clinical testing (9 patients, awake group). Results: The mean motor improvement rates on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-3) between OFF and ON stimulation without medication were 52.3% (95% CI: 45.4–59.2%) in the asleep group and 47.0% (95% CI: 23.8–70.2%) in the awake group, 6 months after surgery. Except for a subcutaneous hematoma, we did not observe any complications related to the surgery. Three patients (33%) in the awake group and 8 in the asleep group (40%) had at least one side effect potentially linked with neurostimulation. Conclusions: Owing to its randomized design, our study supports the hypothesis that motor outcomes after asleep STN-DBS in PD may be noninferior to the standard awake procedure.</description><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><issn>1011-6125</issn><issn>1423-0372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkclOwzAQhi0EglI4cOfgIxwC3rIdQ1mKVEHFco4cZwKmSVzspAhOvAavx5PgqlXRHGY08-mfDaEjSs4oDdNzQkhIqWBiCw284wHhMdv2MaE0iCgL99C-c28e4yJOdtEe5ywUNGYDtMjw9FU6wAw_yLY0jf6CEj9ZLWtsKpy5GmCOF2Bd73D2IWeAH_uie5W1bLTCd72qwVcul9SFlbrFj51u-lp22rS4MhZPpZ3p1pn29_vHg9qBb3eAdipZOzhc-yF6vr56Go2Dyf3N7SibBIqHrAuKgiW0gMLvREvGI29lISBVUEgmlYAyqUikVMlIxcIi4YJUCQ0hToHyqCR8iE5Xun7gfG51I-1nbqTOx9kkX-aIECIlcbignj1ZsXNr3ntwXd5op6CuZQumdzkTUeQPm0bpv6yyxjkL1Uabknz5knzzEs8er9iZtC9gN-S6_AcTgYVP</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Engelhardt, Julien</creator><creator>Caire, François</creator><creator>Damon-Perrière, Nathalie</creator><creator>Guehl, Dominique</creator><creator>Branchard, Olivier</creator><creator>Auzou, Nicolas</creator><creator>Tison, François</creator><creator>Meissner, Wassilios G.</creator><creator>Krim, Elsa</creator><creator>Bannier, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Bénard, Antoine</creator><creator>Sitta, Rémi</creator><creator>Fontaine, Denys</creator><creator>Hoarau, Xavier</creator><creator>Burbaud, Pierre</creator><creator>Cuny, Emmanuel</creator><general>Karger</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease</title><author>Engelhardt, Julien ; Caire, François ; Damon-Perrière, Nathalie ; Guehl, Dominique ; Branchard, Olivier ; Auzou, Nicolas ; Tison, François ; Meissner, Wassilios G. ; Krim, Elsa ; Bannier, Stéphanie ; Bénard, Antoine ; Sitta, Rémi ; Fontaine, Denys ; Hoarau, Xavier ; Burbaud, Pierre ; Cuny, Emmanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb281beb4231d236363db4e9ceba2ac4ed8f06ccd20f25b8340f815e79e136d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caire, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damon-Perrière, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guehl, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branchard, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auzou, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tison, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meissner, Wassilios G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krim, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannier, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bénard, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitta, Rémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Denys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoarau, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burbaud, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuny, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engelhardt, Julien</au><au>Caire, François</au><au>Damon-Perrière, Nathalie</au><au>Guehl, Dominique</au><au>Branchard, Olivier</au><au>Auzou, Nicolas</au><au>Tison, François</au><au>Meissner, Wassilios G.</au><au>Krim, Elsa</au><au>Bannier, Stéphanie</au><au>Bénard, Antoine</au><au>Sitta, Rémi</au><au>Fontaine, Denys</au><au>Hoarau, Xavier</au><au>Burbaud, Pierre</au><au>Cuny, Emmanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease</atitle><jtitle>Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>230-240</pages><issn>1011-6125</issn><eissn>1423-0372</eissn><abstract>Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess the motor outcomes of asleep DBS. Leads were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) according to probabilistic stereotactic coordinates with a surgical robot under O-arm © imaging guidance under either general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings (MER) (20 patients, asleep group) or local anesthesia with MER and clinical testing (9 patients, awake group). Results: The mean motor improvement rates on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-3) between OFF and ON stimulation without medication were 52.3% (95% CI: 45.4–59.2%) in the asleep group and 47.0% (95% CI: 23.8–70.2%) in the awake group, 6 months after surgery. Except for a subcutaneous hematoma, we did not observe any complications related to the surgery. Three patients (33%) in the awake group and 8 in the asleep group (40%) had at least one side effect potentially linked with neurostimulation. Conclusions: Owing to its randomized design, our study supports the hypothesis that motor outcomes after asleep STN-DBS in PD may be noninferior to the standard awake procedure.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>33254172</pmid><doi>10.1159/000511424</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1011-6125 |
ispartof | Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2021-05, Vol.99 (3), p.230-240 |
issn | 1011-6125 1423-0372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000511424 |
source | Karger Journals |
subjects | Clinical Study Cognitive science Neuroscience |
title | A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Phase%202%20Randomized%20Trial%20of%20Asleep%20versus%20Awake%20Subthalamic%20Nucleus%20Deep%20Brain%20Stimulation%20for%20Parkinson%E2%80%99s%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Stereotactic%20and%20functional%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Engelhardt,%20Julien&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=230-240&rft.issn=1011-6125&rft.eissn=1423-0372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000511424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466037969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466037969&rft_id=info:pmid/33254172&rfr_iscdi=true |