A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Asleep versus Awake Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease

Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery 2021-05, Vol.99 (3), p.230-240
Hauptverfasser: Engelhardt, Julien, Caire, François, Damon-Perrière, Nathalie, Guehl, Dominique, Branchard, Olivier, Auzou, Nicolas, Tison, François, Meissner, Wassilios G., Krim, Elsa, Bannier, Stéphanie, Bénard, Antoine, Sitta, Rémi, Fontaine, Denys, Hoarau, Xavier, Burbaud, Pierre, Cuny, Emmanuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is being performed more frequently; however, motor outcomes and safety of asleep DBS have never been assessed in a prospective randomized trial. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative trial to assess the motor outcomes of asleep DBS. Leads were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) according to probabilistic stereotactic coordinates with a surgical robot under O-arm © imaging guidance under either general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings (MER) (20 patients, asleep group) or local anesthesia with MER and clinical testing (9 patients, awake group). Results: The mean motor improvement rates on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-3) between OFF and ON stimulation without medication were 52.3% (95% CI: 45.4–59.2%) in the asleep group and 47.0% (95% CI: 23.8–70.2%) in the awake group, 6 months after surgery. Except for a subcutaneous hematoma, we did not observe any complications related to the surgery. Three patients (33%) in the awake group and 8 in the asleep group (40%) had at least one side effect potentially linked with neurostimulation. Conclusions: Owing to its randomized design, our study supports the hypothesis that motor outcomes after asleep STN-DBS in PD may be noninferior to the standard awake procedure.
ISSN:1011-6125
1423-0372
DOI:10.1159/000511424