Thermal Damage Influences Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Success

Objective: To compare the success rates of two surgical methods of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) at the stage of ostium creation. In procedure 1, a Colorado needle is used to create the mucosectomy, while in procedure 2 no heated instruments are applied to the mucosa. Methods: A total of 173...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic research 2013-01, Vol.49 (4), p.209-214
Hauptverfasser: Garcia Vilaro, Marta, Vásquez, LuzMaría, Marin, Alfonso, Burés, Anniken, Medel, Ramón
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To compare the success rates of two surgical methods of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) at the stage of ostium creation. In procedure 1, a Colorado needle is used to create the mucosectomy, while in procedure 2 no heated instruments are applied to the mucosa. Methods: A total of 173 patients (218 eyes) underwent endonasal DCR between 2006 and 2009. Efficacy was assessed by a fluorescein endoscopic test at 6 months of follow-up. Results: The success rate in group 2 was higher than in group 1 (91 vs. 81%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: We have found a significant difference, which supports that a ‘cold’ surgical technique may be better than the use of heated instruments.
ISSN:0030-3747
1423-0259
DOI:10.1159/000343772