Thermal Damage Influences Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Success
Objective: To compare the success rates of two surgical methods of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) at the stage of ostium creation. In procedure 1, a Colorado needle is used to create the mucosectomy, while in procedure 2 no heated instruments are applied to the mucosa. Methods: A total of 173...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic research 2013-01, Vol.49 (4), p.209-214 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To compare the success rates of two surgical methods of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) at the stage of ostium creation. In procedure 1, a Colorado needle is used to create the mucosectomy, while in procedure 2 no heated instruments are applied to the mucosa. Methods: A total of 173 patients (218 eyes) underwent endonasal DCR between 2006 and 2009. Efficacy was assessed by a fluorescein endoscopic test at 6 months of follow-up. Results: The success rate in group 2 was higher than in group 1 (91 vs. 81%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: We have found a significant difference, which supports that a ‘cold’ surgical technique may be better than the use of heated instruments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0030-3747 1423-0259 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000343772 |