Ureteroscopic Stone Management in Prepubertal Children
Introduction: We retrospectively assessed our experience with ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteric calculi in prepubertal children. Patients and Methods: The records of all children who underwent URS at our institution for ureteral calculi between September 2007 and July 2009 were retrospectively reviewe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologia internationalis 2010-01, Vol.85 (3), p.320-323 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: We retrospectively assessed our experience with ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteric calculi in prepubertal children. Patients and Methods: The records of all children who underwent URS at our institution for ureteral calculi between September 2007 and July 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, stone location and size, pre- and postoperative stenting, intraoperative active dilatation, stone-free rates and complications were noted. Results: A total of 26 patients (20 males and 6 females; mean age 59.9 months) underwent 30 URS procedures with rigid ureteroscopes for 31 ureteral calculi. The mean size of ureteral stones was 8.6 mm. A total of 18 URS procedures were performed without any active ureteral dilatation, and 8 patients underwent 12 passive dilatations of initially inaccessible ureters. Stents remained in place for 2–4 weeks. The stone-free rate was 84.6% for all patients and all procedures. Postoperatively, 12 patients (46%) had stent placement for 2–5 days because of stone burden, edema of the ureteral orifice and hematuria. Conclusions: URS treatment of ureteral stones without active dilatation can be performed safely and effectively in prepubertal children. Passive ureteral dilatation might be necessary in some cases to enable ureteral access. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-1138 1423-0399 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000314925 |