Indications and Results of Surgery for Incidentally Found Adrenal Tumors
Introduction: The accidental discovery of an adrenal mass called incidentaloma has become an increasingly frequent clinical problem with the question of a correct and appropriate therapeutic approach being the subject of controversial discussions. Materials and Methods: Clinical charts of 52 patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologia internationalis 2006-01, Vol.77 (2), p.173-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: The accidental discovery of an adrenal mass called incidentaloma has become an increasingly frequent clinical problem with the question of a correct and appropriate therapeutic approach being the subject of controversial discussions. Materials and Methods: Clinical charts of 52 patients (22 male, 30 female) who underwent adrenalectomy for an incidentaloma at our institution between 1987 and 2001 were reviewed. Results: Median age was 56.4 years. Reasons for surgery were unclear significance in 22 patients, suspicion of malignancy in 5, increase in size in 8, maximum tumor diameter of more than 5 cm in 7, fear of malignancy in 1, and subclinical secretion of cortisol in 5 patients. No data were available for 4 patients. Surgical resection was performed usinga conventional transabdominal approach in 28 patients, a conventional dorsal approach in 17 patients, and an endoscopic retroperitoneal approach in 7 patients. Histopathologic examination ruled out adrenal adenoma in 32 patients, adrenal myelolipoma in 12, unilateral nodular hyperplasia in 4, cystic lesion in 3, and adrenocortical carcinoma in 1 patient. The mean size of all lesions was 5.5 cm. Evaluating the criteria for surgical treatment regarding age of the patients and size of the lesions, 25 patients (48%), including the patient with the adrenocortical carcinoma, were younger than 60 years and had an adrenal lesion exceeding 4 cm in size. During postoperative follow-up that was available for 39 patients, 3 developed contralateral tumors that were treated by resection in 1 and by close follow-up in 2. Conclusions: Size should not be the sole criterion; treatment should be tailored to the individual patient. Especially in patients younger than 60 years with an adrenal lesion exceeding 4 cm in size, an adrenalectomy, predominantly via an endoscopic approach, should be carried out, because a repeated and life-long close follow-up of an anxious patient who has been informed of the diagnosis will in some cases exceed the cost of a single endoscopic operation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-1138 1423-0399 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000093915 |