Abstract IA08: An epigenome perspective of human tumor evolution

Cancers develop through a process of clonal evolution in which ongoing genetic and epigenetic diversification allows for repeated cycles of sub-clonal selection and expansion (Greaves and Maley, 2012; Nowell, 1976). As a result, human tumors can display substantial intratumoral heterogeneity, includ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2016-01, Vol.76 (2_Supplement), p.IA08-IA08
Hauptverfasser: Mazor, Tali, Pankov, Aleksandr, Song, Jun, Costello, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cancers develop through a process of clonal evolution in which ongoing genetic and epigenetic diversification allows for repeated cycles of sub-clonal selection and expansion (Greaves and Maley, 2012; Nowell, 1976). As a result, human tumors can display substantial intratumoral heterogeneity, including discordant genetic alterations between the initial tumor and local recurrence or distant metastases (Gerlinger et al., 2012; Okosun et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2012; Yachida et al., 2010). As mutations accumulate over time, genomic profiling of spatially or temporally separated tumor samples can be used to reconstruct the evolutionary history and underlying clonal architectures of individual tumors (Gerlinger et al., 2014). In contrast to stable genetic events, epigenetic states are reversible and may change in response to the tumor microenvironment, prompting the question whether epigenetic information can similarly be used to discover tumor phylogeny. In low-grade glioma, the course of tumor evolution is particularly clinically significant. Low-grade gliomas are diffuse, infiltrative tumors that recur locally and may unpredictably undergo malignant progression to a higher grade with a worse prognosis (Sanai et al., 2011). Recurrences that progress to highly malignant WHO grade IV glioblastoma (GBM) acquire genetic alterations in the RB and AKT-mTOR pathways (Johnson et al., 2014; Louis, 2006). In fact, adjuvant treatment with alkylating chemotherapeutics such as temozolomide (TMZ) can induce hypermutation that emerges in recurrent tumors (Bodell et al, 2003; Hunter et al., 2006), and we recently linked treatment-associated driver mutations in these two pathways to malignant progression of grade II glioma to GBM (Johnson et al., 2014). The treatment associated malignant progression follows selection of tumor cells with epigenetic silencing of the DNA repair protein MGMT (van Thiujl et al, 2015). The critical role that epigenetic alterations play in the development and therapeutic response of gliomas is increasingly being appreciated (Fouse and Costello, 2009). Somatic mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 may be the first genetic driver in the development of many low-grade gliomas (Johnson et al., 2014; Lai et al., 2011; Watanabe et al., 2009). Genetic mutations in IDH genes induce a pattern of early epigenetic alterations known as the glioma CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) characterized by extensive remodeling of the DNA methylome (Hill et al., 2014; Noushmehr e
ISSN:0008-5472
1538-7445
DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.CHROMEPI15-IA08