Abstract 6537: Single cell transcriptomics uncovers cellular and molecular differences in PBMCs of responders and non-responders to the MUC1 cancer vaccine given in the preventative setting

Introduction: A single arm trial (NCT007773097) and a double-blind, placebo controlled randomized trial (NCT02134925) were conducted in patients with newly diagnosed advanced colonic adenomas to test the safety and immunogenicity of the MUC1 antigen vaccine and its potential to prevent new adenoma formation. These are the first trials of a non-viral cancer vaccine administered in the absence of cancer. In both trials, the vaccine was safe and strongly immunogenic in 43% and 25% of participants (Responders), respectively. The lack of robust response in a significant number of participants suggested, for the first time, that even in a premalignant setting, the immune system may have already been exposed to regulatory influences that, in the case of the vaccine, determine who does and who does not respond. We hypothesized that there could be molecular and cellular differences in the immune competence between vaccine responders and non-responders, and that they could be identified by studying their pre-vaccination peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Methods: The two MUC1 vaccine trials are described in https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.05.22280474 and https://doi.org/10.1158%2F1940-6207.CAPR-12-0275. We performed single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) on banked pre-vaccination PBMCs from 16 Responders and 16 Non-Responders, determined by anti-MUC1 IgG response. Using differential gene expression (DGE), pathway enrichment, and network estimation analyses, we identified specific cell types, genes, and pathways that differ between responders and non-responders. Results: Pre-vaccination PBMCs from Responders contained a significantly higher percentage of CD4+ naive T cells, while Non-Responders showed significantly higher percentage of CD8+ T effector memory (TEM) cells and a higher percentage of CD16+ monocytes. DGE and gene interaction network analysis showed a higher level of expression of T cell activation genes, such as Fos and Jun, in the CD4+ naive T cells in Responders. Further network analysis showed that these genes were directly connected to response. We also found pre-vaccination specific gene ontology (GO) pathways for translational and transcriptional activity enriched in all cell types in Responders compared to Non-Responders. Conclusion: Our analyses identified candidate biomarkers that are predictive of a preventative cancer vaccine response. Thus, our results can be used for patient selection for vaccine administration. Furthermore, we ident