Abstract 2584: Mutations in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and response to BRAF and MEK inhibitors

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) responds poorly to platinum based chemotherapy and is characterized by activating RAS-MAPK pathway mutations, including oncogenic BRAF. Drugs that target this pathway are effective in BRAF-mutant melanoma but other cancer types, such as colorectal cancers, are less sensitive. Early phase trials report a 15% response rate to MEK inhibitors in LGSC patients, however it is not known which features may predict response. We aimed to determine clinical characteristics and treatment response in women with LGSC and to determine whether response to targeted pathway inhibition is associated with specific mutation profiles in LGSC cell lines. Tumor samples from a cohort of grade 1 and 2 serous ovarian cancer patients were analyzed using targeted, exome or whole genome sequencing. Patient characteristics, treatment and clinical outcome were assessed. Cell lines derived from patients with LGSC with known mutation profiles, AOCS2 (KRAS/BRAF/NRAS wild-type), MPSC1 (BRAFV600L, NRASQ16R), VOA1056 (NRASQ16R) and HCC5075 (KRASG12V), were treated with BRAF (dabrafenib) or MEK inhibitors (trametinib, pimasertib and binimetinib) and response was compared to cell lines derived from high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) and BRAF-mutant melanoma. Women diagnosed with grade 1 or 2 serous carcinoma between 1994-2015 were identified from 1654 invasive ovarian serous cancer cases in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study and the GynBiobank. HGSC cases were excluded following histopathology review and TP53 mutation screening. Amongst 65 confirmed LGSC patients, 18 (27.7%) had a KRAS mutation, 9 (13.8%) had a BRAF mutation and 7 (10.8%) had a NRAS mutation. Women with advanced stage LGSC and residual disease following debulking surgery had a similarly poor progression-free and overall-survival compared with HGSC patients. We saw a dramatic response to BRAF inhibition in a patient with BRAFV600E-positive LGSC, however, the LGSC cell lines did not respond to dabrafenib. This is not surprising as the cell lines did not harbour the hot-spot BRAFV600E mutation. MPSC1 has a BRAFV600L and a NRASQ16R mutation, but dabrafenib did not inhibit growth. HCC5075 (KRASG12V) was sensitive to all three MEK inhibitors, but response to MEK inhibition in the other LGSC cell lines was modest. In conclusion, LGSC are generally chemotherapy resistant and molecular analyses can identify targetable mutations. However, LGSC are heterogenous with respect to underlying mutations and r