Dynamic Vibration Characteristics and Mitigation of the Stress‐Ribbon Bridge by Using a Rail‐Damper System

Due to its simple and beautiful architectural appearance, the stress‐ribbon bridge (SRB) has been gradually built around the world as a pedestrian or traffic bridge. However, as characterized by low bending stiffness and low damping ratio features, SRB is prone to the dynamic effects of external exc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Structural control and health monitoring 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Kun, Wang, HanShuo, Wang, Meng, Liu, Bin, Nagarajaiah, Satish, Han, Qiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Due to its simple and beautiful architectural appearance, the stress‐ribbon bridge (SRB) has been gradually built around the world as a pedestrian or traffic bridge. However, as characterized by low bending stiffness and low damping ratio features, SRB is prone to the dynamic effects of external excitations, such as pedestrians, vehicles, and/or winds. To control the vertical vibration of the SRB, a rail‐damper system is proposed in this study. In the proposed scheme, the rotation of the handrails triggered by the flexural deformation of the SRB is utilized to drive the viscous dampers installed between the adjacent handrails. The governing equations of the proposed control system are established. The key design parameters and their influences on the dynamic properties of the control system are systematically investigated. The control performances of the proposed rail‐damper system are further investigated through an SRB numerical model subjected to pedestrian excitations. It is discovered that the rail‐damper system can offer considerable supplemental damping to the structural modes through reasonable design, achieving satisfactory control performances. To gain the excellent effect of the proposed rail‐damper system in real applications, a nondimensional rail stiffness of no less than 1000 is recommended, and the stiffness of the damper should be controlled as small as possible.
ISSN:1545-2255
1545-2263
DOI:10.1155/stc/3296513