Topical Calcipotriol for the Treatment of Cutaneous Warts: An Assessor-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Background. Cutaneous warts are common epidermal proliferations caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of topical calcipotriol for the treatment of cutaneous warts. Methods. This assessor-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial included 56 patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatologic therapy 2023-02, Vol.2023 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background. Cutaneous warts are common epidermal proliferations caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of topical calcipotriol for the treatment of cutaneous warts. Methods. This assessor-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial included 56 patients with cutaneous warts referred to a dermatology clinic from January 21 to March 20, 2020. Patients were randomized into two groups (n = 28). One group received calcipotriol 0.05% ointment twice a day on the lesions with a uniform thickness of 1 mm, and the other group received a placebo. The duration of treatment was twomonths, which continued for another two months if resolution did not occur. The primary outcome was complete response to treatment evaluated four months after the initiation of therapy. Secondary outcomes were the number and size of warts assessed at 1, 2, and 4 months and adverse events, including erythema, pruritus, burning sensation, and scaling. Results. Patients in both groups were comparable regarding previous treatment, underlying disease, and disease duration. However, patients in the control group were older. Also, a higher proportion of patients in the calcipotriol group were male and had warts on their palms and toes. Moreover, a higher percentage of controls had moderate disease. The mean number and the size of lesions did not differ between groups before intervention; however, both were significantly lower in the calcipotriol group than in controls at 1st, 2nd, and 4th months. In addition, complete response to treatment was significantly higher in the calcipotriol group (85.7% vs. 16%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1396-0296 1529-8019 |
DOI: | 10.1155/2023/3427026 |