Progress Towards the Development and Understanding of Energy Dense Rechargeable Batteries Utilizing Zn and Cu

Batteries are easy to use, remotely monitorable, not fuel dependent, easily permitted and installed, and start automatically and reliably during an electrical outage. This makes them optimal for stationary storage and power assurance applications. Within battery-based grid storage, as of mid-2017, lithium-ion, sodium-ion, and lead-acid systems are the leaders, comprising 59% (~1.1 GW), 8% (0.15 GW), and 3% (0.06 GW) of global operational electrochemical storage, respectively.However, these batteries suffer from low energy density, high cost, poor safety, environmental concerns, and/or cycle life. Existing battery options on the market also do not meet the required market needs for long-duration backup power. For example, lead-acid batteries require too much space, are heavy, and contain toxic materials. Lithium-ion batteries, while compact and capable of excellent cycle life, are too expensive to serve long outages and have notable flammability and environmental risks. Alkaline Zn batteries are a strong candidate for electrical grid storage applications due to Zn’s high capacity (820 mAh/g), established materials supply chain and low cost. To realize the highest energy dense batteries, Zn needs to be coupled with a similarly low cost, abundant and high-capacity cathode. CuO (674 mAh/g) is an intriguing high-capacity cathode when paired with Zn in alkaline electrolyte, a battery that until recently has been relegated to the history books as a primary system. In 2021 Schorr et al. reported a rechargeable Zn/CuO battery that utilized a Bi additive to help facilitate the electrochemical reversibility of the Cu conversion electrode. Bi 2 O 3 , a species with comparable redox potentials to Cu 2 O, promoted reversibility and minimized passivation in the historically non-reversible system. The battery cycled without any observable Cu and Bi mixed oxide phases, cycling between metallic Cu and Bi and Cu 2 O/Cu(OH) 2 and Bi 2 O 3 , respectively. Although the Bi additive did not eliminate capacity fade completely, limiting the cells to a 30% depth of discharge (relative to CuO) enabled 250 cycles at > 124 Wh/L. Alternatively, compensating for capacity loss with additional Cu metal provided for very high areal capacities (∼40 mA h/cm 2 ) and energy densities (∼260 W h/L), despite only 65% active material cathode loadings and ∼10% Zn anode utilization; preliminary tests indicated these batteries were prone to shorting. Seeking to improve performance and minimize the spa