Synthesis and in Situ XAFS Investigation of MoO 2 nano-Particles As Li-Ion Battery Anodes
Molybdenum dioxide (MoO 2 ) has appealing properties as an alternative to graphite for Li-ion battery anodes. It has a low electrical resistivity (8.8⋅10⁻⁵ Ω⋅cm for bulk MoO 2 at room temperature [1] vs. about 1⋅10⁻¹ Ω⋅cm for graphite powder electrodes [2] ) and a high theoretical capacity (840 mAh/...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society) 2015-04, Vol.MA2015-01 (2), p.355-355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Molybdenum dioxide (MoO
2
) has appealing properties as an alternative to graphite for Li-ion battery anodes. It has a low electrical resistivity (8.8⋅10⁻⁵ Ω⋅cm for bulk MoO
2
at room temperature
[1]
vs. about 1⋅10⁻¹ Ω⋅cm for graphite powder electrodes
[2]
) and a high theoretical capacity (840 mAh/g
[3]
vs 372 mAh/g for graphite
[4]
). The MoO
2
structure accommodates 4 lithium atoms for every Mo atom, whereas graphite can only accommodate 1 lithium atom per 6 carbon atoms. MoO
2
has a 1.1 V chemical potential versus lithium ions,
[5]
suitable for an anode material. Graphite lithiates at about 0.1 V, yielding a higher cell voltage than MoO
2
, but also making it susceptible to hazardous lithium metal deposition.
[6]
Because MoO
2
undergoes a large volume change while intercalating Li-ions (12% according to DFT calculations
[5]
), its bulk form has limited capacity and cycling stability. This can be significantly enhanced by changing its morphology, but its performance is strongly dependent on synthesis method.
[7]
Li-ion diffusion kinetics in MoO
2
are relatively slow, so the material benefits from nano-scale particles that reduce the diffusion length.
[1]
Many studies have examined synthesis routes for nano-sized MoO
2
oxides
[8][9]
or hybrid materials.
[10][11][12]
This work focuses on synthesizing particles of micron to nano-scale using a low-temperature, wet chemical synthesis, and characterizing the effect of particle size on the electrochemical performance of MoO
2
materials, providing insight into the lithium intercalation mechanism.
As a comparison to MoO
2
, MoO
3
was also investigated.
[13]
It shares morphology dependence and slow kinetics with MoO
2
, but is an insulator.
[14]
Its higher chemical potential makes it more suitable as a cathode material.
[5]
The electrode materials were characterized using X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray absorption spectroscopy fine structure (XAFS).
XAFS is an element-specific technique, probing the local electronic and atomic environment. As XAFS measurements do not require long-range crystalline order, they yield information for both crystalline and amorphous phases, making XAFS a valuable technique for battery material characterization.
XAFS spectra were taken in situ during charge and discharge cycles of bulk and nanoscale MoO
2
half-cells vs. Li metal. This helps elucidate the charge and discharge mechanisms a |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2151-2043 2151-2035 |
DOI: | 10.1149/MA2015-01/2/355 |