Analysis of Cathode Catalyst Layer Structure and Cell Performance in PEFC

In polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC), the catalyst layer (CL) of the cathode needs a large amount of Pt because of the slow oxygen reduction reaction. Since electron, proton, and oxygen are necessary for the cathode reaction, achieving the optimum structure of electrode CL and the efficient transport of the reactants is significantly effective to reduce the usage of Pt catalyst. In this study, the effects of the cathode CL structure on the IV characteristics were evaluated by a model analysis, and superior fabrication methods were investigated experimentally for efficient use of Pt catalyst. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the cathode CL model, here the identical carbon agglomerates with the electrolyte film are dispersed uniformly in the CL (1). In the z -axis of the thicknesses direction, the origin and z = δ CL are the interfaces between polymer membrane and CL, and between CL and gas diffusion layer (GDL), and number of the carbon agglomerates per unit volume in the CL, n ag , is calculated from the parameters for the CL structure. The proton current density in the CL, i H+ , can be expressed by Eq. 1 from the balance of generated current and oxygen consumption.Here, F is Faraday’s constant, S ag is the surface area of a carbon agglomerate is the effective proton conductivity. The oxygen consumption, J O2 ag , corresponds to the oxygen flux in the radial direction of carbon agglomerate at the surface. From the model analysis with various CL structures, it was shown that the increase in total surface area of agglomerates is effective for better IV characteristics. Figure 2 shows the effects of the catalyst preparation conditions on the IV characteristics. A catalyst coated membranes (CCMs) were made by decal transfer method, and two types of the mixing methods of the catalyst ink in the fabrication process, with ball mill and with stirrer, were examined (the hot-press conditions: 2.0 MPa, 120 °C, 30 min). Comparing the IV curves with the CCMs by the same time, 0.5 h, the limiting current density for the ball mill is slightly higher than that for the stirrer. Further, the limiting current density for the ball mill is increased with increasing the mixing intensity of the catalyst ink. To evaluate the cause of the improvement of the IV characteristics, the pore size distributions were compared between with the ball mill and with the stirrer mixing, as shown in Fig. 3. The distribution of the secondary pore diameters (20-100nm) is affected by the m