CLAM POISON: II. PURIFICATION OF CLAM POISON RESIDUES OF LOW TOXICITY BY A HEAVY-PAPER TECHNIQUE

The usefulness of Whatman seed-test and No. 17 papers has been examined for purification and recovery on a preparative scale of the toxin present in residues of low toxicity from the Schantz alumina chromatographic method for purification of clam poison. A method was developed to minimize introducti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of chemistry 1961-10, Vol.39 (10), p.1879-1887
Hauptverfasser: Bannard, R. A. B, Casselman, A. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The usefulness of Whatman seed-test and No. 17 papers has been examined for purification and recovery on a preparative scale of the toxin present in residues of low toxicity from the Schantz alumina chromatographic method for purification of clam poison. A method was developed to minimize introduction of impurities from the papers into fractions recovered after chromatography when t-butanol: acetic acid: water (2:1:1) was used as developer. Seed-test paper gave better separation of the toxin from other components of the residues than did No. 17 paper. Residues of bio-assay as low as 300 MU/mg were found to be capable of enrichment by the method. On a scale of 500 mg per 18 × 22-in. sheet of pretreated seed-test paper, using residues of toxicity 1400 MU/mg, a 67% recovery of toxin enriched fourfold to 5800 MU/mg was achieved in four passes. Increased loading of the paper led to a decrease in both enrichment per pass and over-all recovery of toxin. The paper chromatographic properties, toxicity, and infrared spectrum of the recovered poison agree with those reported by Schantz and co-workers for pure clam poison dihydrochloride, but the specific rotation is lower by 25%. Four possible alternative explanations for the observed anomalous rotation are discussed.
ISSN:0008-4042
1480-3291
DOI:10.1139/v61-252