Hydrometeorological validation of a Canadian Regional Climate Model simulation within the Chaudière and Châteauguay watersheds (Québec, Canada)

This study involved regional validation of a recently developed Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) simulation (version 4.1.1). Four hydrometeorological variables, minimum and maximum daily temperatures, total precipitation, and total runoff, were examined within the Châteauguay and Chaudière wat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of civil engineering 2009-02, Vol.36 (2), p.253-266
Hauptverfasser: Gagnon, P, Konan, B, Rousseau, A.N, Slivitzky, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study involved regional validation of a recently developed Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) simulation (version 4.1.1). Four hydrometeorological variables, minimum and maximum daily temperatures, total precipitation, and total runoff, were examined within the Châteauguay and Chaudière watersheds, Québec, Canada. These watersheds, located in southern Québec, are smaller in area (2530 and 6682 km 2 , respectively) than the size of watersheds usually used to validate this type of model (10 4 -10 6 km 2 ). The objective of the study was to evaluate if the model could reproduce data similar to field observations within these watersheds. A successful model could be used to produce reliable predictions regarding future climate change effects on watershed hydrology within any given watershed demonstrating similar climatological variables. Results show that even though the CRCM can produce reliable results, there remains a significant bias for each variable at least during one season. Analyses show that the bias for maximum temperature is not very strong (30%) and is highly variable in winter and spring. Ideally, the results of this study will be used to guide future studies on the causes of CRCM bias and ultimately lead to model improvement.
ISSN:0315-1468
1208-6029
DOI:10.1139/L08-125