Fourth-Generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: What Is the Evidence?

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is the latest generation of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) to receive approval from the US. FDA, replacing its predecessor, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). The novelty of OFT-Plus is that it elicits a response from CD8 T cells, in addition to CD4 T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-08, Vol.58 (9), Article 01950
Hauptverfasser: Shafeque, Arena, Bigio, Jacob, Hogan, Catherine A., Pai, Madhukar, Banaei, Niaz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is the latest generation of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) to receive approval from the US. FDA, replacing its predecessor, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). The novelty of OFT-Plus is that it elicits a response from CD8 T cells, in addition to CD4 T cells, thus collecting a broader response from T-cell subsets than QFT-GIT. It was developed with the aim to improve the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), especially among recently exposed contacts, immunocompromised hosts, and young children. In this minireview, we summarize the performance of QFT-Plus compared with that of QFT-GIT among active tuberculosis (TB) patients (a surrogate for LTBI patients), high-risk populations, and low-risk individuals based on recent publications. Studies comparing QFT-Plus to QFT-GIT currently do not support the superior performance of QFT-Plus in individuals with active TB and LTBI. The difference in sensitivity between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT in active TB patients was not significant in nearly all studies and ranged from -4.0 to 2.0%. Among high-risk groups, the agreement between OFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was 89.9 to 96.0% (kappa coefficient range, 0.80 to 0.91). The specificity in the low-risk population was slightly lower for QFT-Plus than for OFT-GIT, with the difference ranging from -7.4 to 0%. Further studies are needed to accurately evaluate the sensitivity of QFT-Plus in immunocompromised hosts and children. In addition, further evidence is required to validate a modified interpretation of OFT-Plus for the identification of false-positive results in low-risk health care workers.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.01950-19