Response to Comment on “Activation of methane to CH 3 + : A selective industrial route to methanesulfonic acid”
Roytman and Singleton argue that our proposed electrophilic mechanism for the sulfonation of methane in superacid conditions is “not plausible.” We clarify certain terms that might have caused misinterpretation of our proposed mechanism and supplement the discussion. We reaffirm that an electrophili...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2020-08, Vol.369 (6504) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Roytman and Singleton argue that our proposed electrophilic mechanism for the sulfonation of methane in superacid conditions is “not plausible.” We clarify certain terms that might have caused misinterpretation of our proposed mechanism and supplement the discussion. We reaffirm that an electrophilic mechanism may be operative under our reaction conditions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
DOI: | 10.1126/science.aax9966 |