Cellular Resistance to the Antitumor DNA Topoisomerase II Inhibitor S16020-2: Importance of the N-[2(Dimethylamino)ethyl]carbamoyl Side Chain
The new olivacine derivative S16020-2 (NSC-659687) is a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor endowed with a remarkable antitumor activity against various experimental tumors. In vitro physicochemical properties of this compound, in particular its interaction with DNA and DNA topoisomerase II, were very si...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular pharmacology 2000-10, Vol.58 (4), p.709-718 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The new olivacine derivative S16020-2 (NSC-659687) is a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor endowed with a remarkable antitumor
activity against various experimental tumors. In vitro physicochemical properties of this compound, in particular its interaction
with DNA and DNA topoisomerase II, were very similar to those of ellipticine derivatives, except for a strictly ATP-dependent
mechanism of cleavable complex induction. From the Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cell line DC-3F, a subline resistant to
S16020-2, named DC-3F/S16, was selected by adding stepwise increasing concentrations of the drug to the cell growth medium.
Whereas DC-3F/9-OH-E cells, a DC-3F subline resistant to 9-hydroxy-ellipticine, are cross-resistant to S16020-2, DC-3F/S16
cells are only very weakly cross-resistant to ellipticine derivatives, indicating that, despite their structural similarity,
these compounds may differ in their mechanisms of action. Uptake and efflux rates of S16020-2 were identical in the resistant
and the sensitive cells. Topoisomerase IIα was expressed at the same level in both sensitive and resistant cells, whereas
expression of the β-enzyme was approximately 50% lower in the resistant cells. Sequencing of both α- and β-isoform cDNAs revealed
a point mutation that converts Arg 486 to a Gly in the α cDNA, whereas the β cDNA was not modified. This amino acid substitution in a highly conserved sequence
of the enzyme appears to be responsible for the resistance to S16020-2. Comparative analysis of the properties of the ellipticine
and S16020-2-resistant cells suggests that S16020-2, which is a DNA intercalator, might also interact with this enzyme amino
acid sequence through its side chain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-895X 1521-0111 |
DOI: | 10.1124/mol.58.4.709 |