Frequency dependence of thresholds for lethal cardiomyocyte injury in myocardial contrast echocardiography

Contrast enhanced diagnostic ultrasound employs microbubble activation for microvascular imaging; however, the on-screen Mechanical Index is a poor parameter for safety guidance. More research is needed on microvascular bioeffects, particularly their variation with frequency. A GE Vivid 7 with an S3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2015-09, Vol.138 (3_Supplement), p.1909-1909
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Douglas L., Lu, Xiaofang, Dou, Chunyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contrast enhanced diagnostic ultrasound employs microbubble activation for microvascular imaging; however, the on-screen Mechanical Index is a poor parameter for safety guidance. More research is needed on microvascular bioeffects, particularly their variation with frequency. A GE Vivid 7 with an S3 probe operated at 1.6 MHz, and an S5 probe operated at 2.5 and 3.5 MHz was used for myocardial contrast echocardiography of rats mounted in a water bath. Power settings were varied in 2 dB steps for determination of the thresholds for cardiomyocyte injury. The contrast agent was made to duplicate the properties of the clinical agent Definity. The scans were intermittently triggered each 4 heartbeats from the ECG signal. The cardiomyocyte death was assessed using Evans blue vital staining. Thresholds were defined as the mean of the lowest exposure with a statistically significant cardiomyocyte death and the next lower exposure level. Thresholds were 1.2 MPa, 1.7 MPa, and 2.7 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude (derated for 1 dB/cm/MHz attenuation) for 1.6, 2.5, and 3.5 MHz, respectively. Linear regression showed that the thresholds were essentially proportional to frequency (0.72 f1.02, r2 = 0.97). Theoretical analysis is under development to explain this dependence and develop a contrast-specific safety parameter.
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/1.4934003