An acoustic comparison of two women’s infant- and adult-directed speech

In addition to having prosodic characteristics that are attractive to infant listeners, infant-directed (ID) speech shares certain characteristics of adult-directed (AD) clear speech, such as increased acoustic distance between vowels, that might be expected to make ID speech easier for adults to perceive in noise than AD conversational speech. However, perceptual tests of two women’s ID productions by Andruski and Bessega [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2355] showed that is not always the case. In a word identification task that compared ID speech with AD clear and conversational speech, one speaker’s ID productions were less well-identified than AD clear speech, but better identified than AD conversational speech. For the second woman, ID speech was the least accurately identified of the three speech registers. For both speakers, hard words (infrequent words with many lexical neighbors) were also at an increased disadvantage relative to easy words (frequent words with few lexical neighbors) in speech registers that were less accurately perceived. This study will compare several acoustic properties of these women’s productions, including pitch and formant-frequency characteristics. Results of the acoustic analyses will be examined with the original perceptual results to suggest reasons for differences in listener’s accuracy in identifying these two women’s ID speech in noise.