Speech recognition in single- and multichannel cochlear implants

Two speech processing systems, a four-channel vocoder-based model and a single-channel model, were examined in a single patient. Five isolated, computer-generated vowels were presented in a closed-set paradigm and responses were plotted on a confusion matrix. With four-channel stimulation the overal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985-04, Vol.77 (S1), p.S81-S81
Hauptverfasser: Ochs, Marleen T., White, Mark S., Merzenich, Michael M., Schubert, Earl D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two speech processing systems, a four-channel vocoder-based model and a single-channel model, were examined in a single patient. Five isolated, computer-generated vowels were presented in a closed-set paradigm and responses were plotted on a confusion matrix. With four-channel stimulation the overall score was 64% correct. The subject never confused vowels having a low-frequency second formant (F2) with high-frequency F2 items. In the single-channel configuration, the subject did not distinguish between low F2 and high F2 items and scored 29% overall. Consonant confusion matrices were generated for seven naturally produced VCV syllables. In the four-channel configuration the overall score was 70% correct. The nasal distinction was not made and some voicing errors were observed. In the single-channel case, the subject scored 27% correct. The stop-continuant distinction was not routinely made and most errors involved multiple distinctive features. Analysis of the processed speech items explain some of the confusions observed in the four-channel mode. [Work supported by NIH Grant NS-11804.]
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/1.2022535