Measuring hearing protector attenuation of impulse noise on acoustic test fixtures using maximum A-weighted energy reduction
Hearing protection devices (HPDs) and firearm suppressors can help mitigate risk of hearing loss from small caliber firearms. ANSI S12.42 is the standard for measuring HPD impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL). No consensus standard exists for measuring firearm suppressor noise reduction, though the in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2024-03, Vol.155 (3_Supplement), p.A66-A66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Hearing protection devices (HPDs) and firearm suppressors can help mitigate risk of hearing loss from small caliber firearms. ANSI S12.42 is the standard for measuring HPD impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL). No consensus standard exists for measuring firearm suppressor noise reduction, though the industry is working toward a standard using maximum accumulated A-weighted energy. A common attenuation metric for different impulse noise reduction technologies would inform the individual and combined impact of these technologies. The maximum A-weighted energy reduction for several HPDs was assessed using firearm impulses from two rifles (0.300 Winchester Magnum and 5.56x45) with two ATFs and five field microphones positioned on opposite sides of the gun at four locations (field levels between 180- and 140-dB pSPL). No adjustments were made to account for tissue/bone conduction. Maximum A-weighted energy reduction values for single protection ranged between 17 dB (earmuff with safety glasses) and 43 dB (preformed earplug). Similar to IPIL, maximum A-weighted energy reduction increased with increased impulse levels. Advantages, disadvantages, and technical issues associated with the procedure will be discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
DOI: | 10.1121/10.0026822 |