SU‐GG‐T‐230: Method to Validate the Dosimetric Accuracy of Motion Tracking in Cyberknife Using a CIRS Dynamic Phantom

Purpose: The dose distributions in Cyberknife planning are more conformal with steeper dose gradients than what has been available with gantry based linear accelerators. With the inception of the motion tracking algorithm, these steep dose gradients are delivered to a small moving lesion with submil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Physics 2008-06, Vol.35 (6), p.2778-2778
Hauptverfasser: Munoz, C, Hevezi, J, Waggener, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: The dose distributions in Cyberknife planning are more conformal with steeper dose gradients than what has been available with gantry based linear accelerators. With the inception of the motion tracking algorithm, these steep dose gradients are delivered to a small moving lesion with submillimeter targeting accuracy. The CIRS dynamic phantom will be used to validate the dose accuracy of a moving target and compare to a static target. Method and Materials: The phantom was scanned with a 4 slice GE HiSpeed helical scanner at 1 mm slice intervals. The treatment regiment for each delivered plan was one fraction at 20 Gy to the 85% isodose line. The exposed gafchromic film was scanned and analyzed with ImageJ to acquire dose profiles in each plane. Results: The dose profiles showed dips that coincided with lower dose regions in the treatment plan. This was apparent in measurements with the phantom static as well as with the phantom in motion. Treatments delivered to the dynamic phantom yielded results within 5% of the prescribed dose as compared to static deliveries. Conclusion: The CIRS dynamic phantom provides a method to validate the dosimetric accuracy of Cyberknife when compensating for complex motion. This is a sound method to include in the quality assurance program. Because this can be a lengthy procedure, up to two hours, it may be more feasible to include in a quarterly or annual quality assurance program.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.2961982