Oxidation of deuterium-, acetylene-, and ethylene-terminated Si(100) by atomic oxygen
The oxidation of deuterium-, acetylene-, and ethylene-terminated Si(100) by gas-phase atomic oxygen is evaluated using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). The atomic oxygen is generated by the 157 nm laser photolysis of O 2 , which results in nominally a 50/50 mix of the ground ( 3 P) and electronica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films Vacuum, surfaces, and films, 2002-01, Vol.20 (1), p.76-83 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The oxidation of deuterium-, acetylene-, and ethylene-terminated Si(100) by gas-phase atomic oxygen is evaluated using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). The atomic oxygen is generated by the 157 nm laser photolysis of
O
2
,
which results in nominally a 50/50 mix of the ground
(
3
P)
and electronically excited
(
1
D)
state species. O atom adsorption probabilities for oxygen coverages in the 1–3 ML regime are estimated to be on the order of 0.1 for these adlayer systems. For both
C
2
H
2
and
C
2
H
4
adlayers no effective loss of surface carbon is observed, indicating that there first must be extensive oxidation of the near-surface region of silicon (greater than about 3 ML) prior to the removal of chemisorbed carbon on Si(100). The O/Si AES ratio for the O atom oxidation for oxygen coverages of about 1–3 ML in the near-surface regime is found to be linear with O atom exposure for all three adlayers, with the propensity for reaction being given by the relative slopes of 1.0:1.4:2.0 for D-,
C
2
H
2
-,
and
C
2
H
4
-terminated Si(100), respectively. The relatively low rate for O atom oxidation of D-terminated Si(100) suggests that the presence of defects facilitates the oxidation. While the difference in the oxidation rates for the
C
2
H
2
and
C
2
H
4
adlayers is statistically significant, this is most likely not due to initial adlayer coverage effects; the specific cause(s) of this difference, however, is not established. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0734-2101 1520-8559 |
DOI: | 10.1116/1.1421598 |