Challenge to Collect Empirical Data for Human Reliability Analysis—Illustrated by the Difficulties in Collecting Empirical Data on the Performance-Shaping Factor Complexity

This paper discusses the challenges with collecting positivistic empirical data (objective, observable, reliable, replicable, experimental, and true) in human reliability analysis (HRA), and illustrates it by presenting the difficulties in collecting empirical data on the performance-shaping factor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ASCE-ASME journal of risk and uncertainty in engineering systems, Part B. Mechanical engineering Part B. Mechanical engineering, 2020-03, Vol.6 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Laumann, Karin, Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper discusses the challenges with collecting positivistic empirical data (objective, observable, reliable, replicable, experimental, and true) in human reliability analysis (HRA), and illustrates it by presenting the difficulties in collecting empirical data on the performance-shaping factor (PSF) complexity. The PSF complexity was chosen to illustrate the difficulties with empirically collecting data because it is included in many HRA guidelines and it has been discussed as an important PSF to understand error rates in large accident scenarios. This paper discusses the challenges with collecting empirical data from a pure positivistic paradigm with experiments, as well as from literature reviews and data from event reports, training, and operations. The paper concludes that because of all the challenges with the positivistic empirical data collections methods in HRA, we should discuss whether experts' judgements could be a better approach to obtain HRA data and error rates. In a postpositivistic view, qualitative data or experts' judgments could also be looked at as empirical data if the data were collected in a systematic and transparent way.
ISSN:2332-9017
2332-9025
DOI:10.1115/1.4044795