Mechanical Performance of Generic and Proprietary Enema Bottles
Enemas containing the anti-inflammatory drug mesalamine are an effective treatment for a distal form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). An IBD patient discovered that a generic mesalamine enema was more difficult and painful to use than the proprietary version. A study was initiated to determine w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical devices 2008-06, Vol.2 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Enemas containing the anti-inflammatory drug mesalamine are an effective treatment for a distal form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). An IBD patient discovered that a generic mesalamine enema was more difficult and painful to use than the proprietary version. A study was initiated to determine whether these differences were measurable in the laboratory using conventional mechanical test equipment. Differences among three bottle types (the proprietary brand and two generic versions) were quantified by mechanical testing. The compressive force required to squeeze the drug from each bottle was measured, tensile testing was performed on the bottle wall, and stiffness of the nozzle tips was studied via bend testing. The thickness of the bottle walls and the inner diameter (ID) of the nozzles were also recorded. The work required to expel the drug from the generic versions during bottle compression was significantly greater than for the proprietary (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-6181 1932-619X |
DOI: | 10.1115/1.2902856 |