Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Rokitamycin (RKM) and Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the Treatment of Campylobacter Enteritis by a Double-Blind Method

The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Rokitamycin (RKM), a new macrolide antibiotic, were compared with those of Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double blind method. The daily dose level of RKM or OFLX was 600 mg. They were orally administered in three di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1991/09/20, Vol.65(9), pp.1165-1182
Hauptverfasser: OBANA, Mitsuo, TOMIZAWA, Isao, TAKIZAWA, Yoshihiko, NITTA, Yoshiro, SAGARA, Hiroko, SEO, Takehisa, SATO, Junichi, TSUNODA, Takafumi, OTA, Satomi, MACHII, Akira, NAKAMURA, Yoshitaka, KATANO, Teiko, MURATA, Misako, OHNISHI, Kenji, YAMAGUCHI, Tsuyoshi, MASUDA, Gohta, NEGISHI, Masayoshi, AJISAWA, Atsushi, KITAHARA, Mitsuo, LEE, Keiko, IRIMAJIRI, Shoichiro, MATSUOKA, Yasuo, MATSUMOTO, Fumio, IMAI, Takeo, SAKURAI, Iwao, TAKAHASHI, Takayuki, AMANO, Fukiko, MURAMOTO, Akira, NAKAMURA, Chie, KANOU, Hideyuki, NARUSE, Jun, KIM, Yong-ki, INAMOTO, Yasuhiko, AKAO, Mitsuru, SAKAUE, Yoshihiro, HOSODA, Shiro, BAMBA, Tadao, TATEWAKI, Kenichi, YOSHIKAWA, Kunio, MATSUSHITA, Iwao, FUSE, Kenji, SASAKI, Masaya, KURISU, Kuniko, NAKAGAWA, Masao, KITOH, Katsuyuki, KAWAJIRI, Toshio, KIZU, Minoru, SHIOMI, Takehiko, KATAOKA, Sadao, KAWAGUCHI, Yoshio, FUKUMOTO, Akira, TAMURA, Kazuya, MURAI, Masami, TANAKA, Michio, KURIMURA, Osamu, MATSUBARA, Yoshio, SAITO, Makoto, IMAGAWA, Yatsuka, NAKAYA, Rintaro, HORIUCHI, Sankichi, INAGAKI, Yoshio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Rokitamycin (RKM), a new macrolide antibiotic, were compared with those of Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double blind method. The daily dose level of RKM or OFLX was 600 mg. They were orally administered in three divided doses for 5 days. Of 223 cases studied, 106 cases were diagnosed as Campylobacter enteritis. Ninety cases (RKM group: 50, OFLX group: 40) except for 16 excluded or drop-out cases were analysed. There was no significant difference between the two groups in any background factors. The effectiveness and usefulness was evaluated in 88 cases (RKM group: 48, OFLX group: 40). The results obtained were as follows: 1. In a total of 82 strains of Campylobacter jejuni/coli (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 40), the bacteriological efficacy rate of RKM (95.2%) was superior to that of OFLX (70.0%) with a significant difference (p=0.006). 2. In 76 symptomatic patients (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 34) on the day of the beginning of drug administration, the clinical efficacy rate was 97.6% in the RKM group and 85.3% in the OFLX group with no significant difference between the two groups. 3. In 88 evaluable patients, the global clinical efficacy rate of RKM (95.8%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p=0.001). 4. Side effect was observed in 1 (1.9%) of the 54 patients in the RKM group and none of the 44 patients in the OFLX group. Slightly abnormal laboratory findings were seen in 4 (10.8%) of the 37 patients treated with RKM and 3 (9.7%) of the 31 patients treated with OFLX, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 5. In 88 evaluable patients, the clinical usefulness of RKM (91.7%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p=0.01). From these results, RKM is considered to be a very useful agent for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis.
ISSN:0387-5911
1884-569X
DOI:10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1165