Aerobic high-intensity intervals are superior to improve V̇O 2max compared with sprint intervals in well-trained men

Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O ) may be the single most important factor for long-distance running performance. Interval training, enabling high intensity, is forwarded as the format that yields the largest increase in V̇O . However, it is uncertain if an optimal outcome on V̇O , anaerobic capacity, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2023-02, Vol.33 (2), p.146-159
Hauptverfasser: Hov, Håkon, Wang, Eivind, Lim, Yi Rui, Trane, Glenn, Hemmingsen, Magnus, Hoff, Jan, Helgerud, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O ) may be the single most important factor for long-distance running performance. Interval training, enabling high intensity, is forwarded as the format that yields the largest increase in V̇O . However, it is uncertain if an optimal outcome on V̇O , anaerobic capacity, and running performance is provided by training with a high aerobic intensity or high overall intensity. Thus, we randomized 48 aerobically well-trained men (23 ± 3 years) to three commonly applied interval protocols, one with high aerobic intensity (HIIT) and two with high absolute intensity (sprint interval training; SIT), 3× week for 8 weeks: (1) HIIT: 4 × 4 min at ~95% maximal aerobic speed (MAS) with 3 min active breaks. (2) SIT: 8 × 20 s at ~150% MAS with 10 s passive breaks. (3) SIT: 10 × 30 s at ~175% MAS with 3.5 min active breaks. V̇O increased more (p 
ISSN:0905-7188
1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/sms.14251