Response of submarine braided channels to varying inflow hydrographs: Geomorphic experiments and stratigraphic implications

Submarine channels on the seafloor experience a range of turbidity current‐flood hydrographs. The characteristics of the flood hydrograph influence channel dimensions, the number of channel threads (i.e. braiding intensity) and the depositional properties of sandbars within the channels. However, the morphodynamic response of submarine braided channels to different hydrograph patterns is poorly understood. In this study, six geomorphic experiments are used to test how varied flood hydrographs affect the braiding intensity and sandbar geometry within submarine channels. Three experiments represent the control group with constant density‐current inflow, and three experiments use different time‐varying hydrograph patterns. The experiments show that, as the inflow‐to‐sediment discharge ratio increases, multiple small channels coalesce into a few main channels, causing a decrease in active braiding intensity defined by the channel threads with flow. When the flow returns to the initial low flow rate, active braiding intensity increases again. These observations show that the inflow‐to‐sediment discharge ratio determines the value of active braiding intensity. Additionally, active braiding intensity is directly proportional to dimensionless sediment‐stream power and dimensionless stream power, in agreement with previously established trends for both submarine and fluvial braided channels. In contrast to active braiding intensity changes, the measured sandbar aspect ratio and compactness ratio (i.e. ratio of planform area to perimeter) of submarine braided channels is insensitive to changes in the hydrograph. However, when inflows reach peak discharge, the higher transport capacity erodes pre‐existing deposits, forming noticeable erosional surfaces, and subsequently depositing thicker sandbars during that stage. These observations imply that sandbar planform morphology is largely insensitive to hydrograph, but hydrograph variability induces a greater variability in the resultant stratigraphic packages. The experimental results predict that field‐scale stratigraphy should be dominated by strata deposited during intervals of high flow, but that these strata will also exhibit reduced lateral continuity compared to formation scenarios with constant discharge.