Filtration of sea louse, L epeophtheirus salmonis , copepodids by the blue mussel, M ytilus edulis , and the A tlantic sea scallop, P lacopecten magellanicus , under different flow, light and copepodid‐density regimes

Population management of L epeophtheirus salmonis in C anada currently relies on chemotherapeutants to remove attached stages of the ectoparasite. However, some populations of L . salmonis are developing resistance to chemotherapeutants making alternate management measures necessary. This article ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fish diseases 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.361-370
Hauptverfasser: Bartsch, A, Robinson, S M C, Liutkus, M, Ang, K P, Webb, J, Pearce, C M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 370
container_issue 3
container_start_page 361
container_title Journal of fish diseases
container_volume 36
creator Bartsch, A
Robinson, S M C
Liutkus, M
Ang, K P
Webb, J
Pearce, C M
description Population management of L epeophtheirus salmonis in C anada currently relies on chemotherapeutants to remove attached stages of the ectoparasite. However, some populations of L . salmonis are developing resistance to chemotherapeutants making alternate management measures necessary. This article explores the ability of filter‐feeding shellfish [ i.e . blue mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) and A tlantic sea scallops ( P lacopecten magellanicus )] to consume the copepodid stages of L . salmonis in the laboratory under static and flowing water conditions, with variable copepodid densities, and with the aid of a light attractant. M ytilus edulis consumed copepodids under both static and flowing water conditions, and the proportion of individuals ingested was similar at low and high copepodid densities, suggesting that M . edulis was not saturated at the concentrations tested. Also, M . edulis consumed more copepodids when a light attractant was present, suggesting that lights may be useful to concentrate widely dispersed copepodids around cultured shellfish in the field. Finally, P . magellanicus consumed the same number of copepodids as an equivalent total wet weight of M . edulis . During each of the four separate experiments, shellfish consumed between 18 and 38% of the copepodids presented per hour, suggesting that both species are well suited for low level removal of copepodids over time.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jfd.12069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jfd_12069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1111_jfd_12069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-47d2c761430644bba4abf3c37b76ffeacf0caba93716283fdd5d9ee9d97216753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kbtOxDAQRS0EEsuj4A-mRUrAzsukXCFe0iIo6CPHHu965cSR7Qhtxyfwf3R8CdmAmGaae-4dzSXkgtErNs31VqsrltGqPiALlldlmvGKHZIFZQVNOeflMTkJYUsp4yWrFuTr3tjoRTSuB6choADrxoAJrAAHdMMmbtD4MUAQtnO9CZCAdAMOThkVoN3BJIDWjgjdGALaBJ5hF42dEFSjnQHRq1m2hGhFH42cg4IU1rohgVewYu8pI_bQiTXaSWXkuEfHXqEHZbRGj30Ebd17AtasN3G2_b_l--NTYR9M3IHHtekwnJEjLWzA8799St7u795uH9PVy8PT7XKVSl7UacFVJqcnFTmtiqJtRSFancuct7yaQoXUVIpW1DlnVXaTa6VKVSPWquYZq3iZn5LLX1vpXQgedTN40wm_axht9qU0UynNXEr-AzCPhUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Filtration of sea louse, L epeophtheirus salmonis , copepodids by the blue mussel, M ytilus edulis , and the A tlantic sea scallop, P lacopecten magellanicus , under different flow, light and copepodid‐density regimes</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Bartsch, A ; Robinson, S M C ; Liutkus, M ; Ang, K P ; Webb, J ; Pearce, C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, A ; Robinson, S M C ; Liutkus, M ; Ang, K P ; Webb, J ; Pearce, C M</creatorcontrib><description>Population management of L epeophtheirus salmonis in C anada currently relies on chemotherapeutants to remove attached stages of the ectoparasite. However, some populations of L . salmonis are developing resistance to chemotherapeutants making alternate management measures necessary. This article explores the ability of filter‐feeding shellfish [ i.e . blue mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) and A tlantic sea scallops ( P lacopecten magellanicus )] to consume the copepodid stages of L . salmonis in the laboratory under static and flowing water conditions, with variable copepodid densities, and with the aid of a light attractant. M ytilus edulis consumed copepodids under both static and flowing water conditions, and the proportion of individuals ingested was similar at low and high copepodid densities, suggesting that M . edulis was not saturated at the concentrations tested. Also, M . edulis consumed more copepodids when a light attractant was present, suggesting that lights may be useful to concentrate widely dispersed copepodids around cultured shellfish in the field. Finally, P . magellanicus consumed the same number of copepodids as an equivalent total wet weight of M . edulis . During each of the four separate experiments, shellfish consumed between 18 and 38% of the copepodids presented per hour, suggesting that both species are well suited for low level removal of copepodids over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-7775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfd.12069</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of fish diseases, 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.361-370</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-47d2c761430644bba4abf3c37b76ffeacf0caba93716283fdd5d9ee9d97216753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-47d2c761430644bba4abf3c37b76ffeacf0caba93716283fdd5d9ee9d97216753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liutkus, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, K P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, C M</creatorcontrib><title>Filtration of sea louse, L epeophtheirus salmonis , copepodids by the blue mussel, M ytilus edulis , and the A tlantic sea scallop, P lacopecten magellanicus , under different flow, light and copepodid‐density regimes</title><title>Journal of fish diseases</title><description>Population management of L epeophtheirus salmonis in C anada currently relies on chemotherapeutants to remove attached stages of the ectoparasite. However, some populations of L . salmonis are developing resistance to chemotherapeutants making alternate management measures necessary. This article explores the ability of filter‐feeding shellfish [ i.e . blue mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) and A tlantic sea scallops ( P lacopecten magellanicus )] to consume the copepodid stages of L . salmonis in the laboratory under static and flowing water conditions, with variable copepodid densities, and with the aid of a light attractant. M ytilus edulis consumed copepodids under both static and flowing water conditions, and the proportion of individuals ingested was similar at low and high copepodid densities, suggesting that M . edulis was not saturated at the concentrations tested. Also, M . edulis consumed more copepodids when a light attractant was present, suggesting that lights may be useful to concentrate widely dispersed copepodids around cultured shellfish in the field. Finally, P . magellanicus consumed the same number of copepodids as an equivalent total wet weight of M . edulis . During each of the four separate experiments, shellfish consumed between 18 and 38% of the copepodids presented per hour, suggesting that both species are well suited for low level removal of copepodids over time.</description><issn>0140-7775</issn><issn>1365-2761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kbtOxDAQRS0EEsuj4A-mRUrAzsukXCFe0iIo6CPHHu965cSR7Qhtxyfwf3R8CdmAmGaae-4dzSXkgtErNs31VqsrltGqPiALlldlmvGKHZIFZQVNOeflMTkJYUsp4yWrFuTr3tjoRTSuB6choADrxoAJrAAHdMMmbtD4MUAQtnO9CZCAdAMOThkVoN3BJIDWjgjdGALaBJ5hF42dEFSjnQHRq1m2hGhFH42cg4IU1rohgVewYu8pI_bQiTXaSWXkuEfHXqEHZbRGj30Ebd17AtasN3G2_b_l--NTYR9M3IHHtekwnJEjLWzA8799St7u795uH9PVy8PT7XKVSl7UacFVJqcnFTmtiqJtRSFancuct7yaQoXUVIpW1DlnVXaTa6VKVSPWquYZq3iZn5LLX1vpXQgedTN40wm_axht9qU0UynNXEr-AzCPhUg</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Bartsch, A</creator><creator>Robinson, S M C</creator><creator>Liutkus, M</creator><creator>Ang, K P</creator><creator>Webb, J</creator><creator>Pearce, C M</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Filtration of sea louse, L epeophtheirus salmonis , copepodids by the blue mussel, M ytilus edulis , and the A tlantic sea scallop, P lacopecten magellanicus , under different flow, light and copepodid‐density regimes</title><author>Bartsch, A ; Robinson, S M C ; Liutkus, M ; Ang, K P ; Webb, J ; Pearce, C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-47d2c761430644bba4abf3c37b76ffeacf0caba93716283fdd5d9ee9d97216753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liutkus, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, K P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, C M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of fish diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartsch, A</au><au>Robinson, S M C</au><au>Liutkus, M</au><au>Ang, K P</au><au>Webb, J</au><au>Pearce, C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Filtration of sea louse, L epeophtheirus salmonis , copepodids by the blue mussel, M ytilus edulis , and the A tlantic sea scallop, P lacopecten magellanicus , under different flow, light and copepodid‐density regimes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fish diseases</jtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>361-370</pages><issn>0140-7775</issn><eissn>1365-2761</eissn><abstract>Population management of L epeophtheirus salmonis in C anada currently relies on chemotherapeutants to remove attached stages of the ectoparasite. However, some populations of L . salmonis are developing resistance to chemotherapeutants making alternate management measures necessary. This article explores the ability of filter‐feeding shellfish [ i.e . blue mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) and A tlantic sea scallops ( P lacopecten magellanicus )] to consume the copepodid stages of L . salmonis in the laboratory under static and flowing water conditions, with variable copepodid densities, and with the aid of a light attractant. M ytilus edulis consumed copepodids under both static and flowing water conditions, and the proportion of individuals ingested was similar at low and high copepodid densities, suggesting that M . edulis was not saturated at the concentrations tested. Also, M . edulis consumed more copepodids when a light attractant was present, suggesting that lights may be useful to concentrate widely dispersed copepodids around cultured shellfish in the field. Finally, P . magellanicus consumed the same number of copepodids as an equivalent total wet weight of M . edulis . During each of the four separate experiments, shellfish consumed between 18 and 38% of the copepodids presented per hour, suggesting that both species are well suited for low level removal of copepodids over time.</abstract><doi>10.1111/jfd.12069</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-7775
ispartof Journal of fish diseases, 2013-03, Vol.36 (3), p.361-370
issn 0140-7775
1365-2761
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jfd_12069
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Filtration of sea louse, L epeophtheirus salmonis , copepodids by the blue mussel, M ytilus edulis , and the A tlantic sea scallop, P lacopecten magellanicus , under different flow, light and copepodid‐density regimes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Filtration%20of%20sea%20louse,%20L%20epeophtheirus%20salmonis%20,%20copepodids%20by%20the%20blue%20mussel,%20M%20ytilus%20edulis%20,%20and%20the%20A%20tlantic%20sea%20scallop,%20P%20lacopecten%20magellanicus%20,%20under%20different%20flow,%20light%20and%20copepodid%E2%80%90density%20regimes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fish%20diseases&rft.au=Bartsch,%20A&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=361-370&rft.issn=0140-7775&rft.eissn=1365-2761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfd.12069&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1111_jfd_12069%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true