Simpler is better: fewer non‐target insects trapped with a four‐component chemical lure vs. a chemically more complex food‐type bait for D rosophila suzukii

Baits – fermented food products – are generally attractive to many types of insects, which makes it difficult to sort through non‐target insects to monitor a pest species of interest. We test the hypothesis that a chemically simpler and more defined attractant developed for a target insect is more specific and attracts fewer non‐target insects than a chemically more complex food‐type bait. A four‐component chemical lure isolated from a food bait and optimized for the spotted wing drosophila ( SWD ), D rosophila suzukii ( M atsumura) ( D iptera: D rosophilidae), was compared to the original wine/vinegar bait to assess the relative responses of non‐target insects. In several field experiments in Washington State, USA , it was shown that numbers of pest muscid flies, cutworm and armyworm moths, and pest yellowjackets were reduced in traps baited with the chemical lure compared to the wine/vinegar bait. In other field experiments in the states of Washington, Oregon, and New York, numbers of non‐target drosophilid flies were also reduced in traps baited with the chemical lure relative to wine/vinegar bait. In Washington, numbers of D rosophila melanogaster M eigen and D rosophila obscura F allen species groups and D rosophila immigrans Sturtevant were reduced in the chemical lure traps, whereas in New York, D . melanogaster and D . obscura species groups, D . immigrans , D rosophila putrida S turtevant, D rosophila simulans S turtevant, D rosophila tripunctata L oew, and C hymomyza spp. numbers were reduced. In O regon, this same effect was observed with the D . melanogaster species group. Taken together, these results indicate that the four‐component SWD chemical lure will be more selective for SWD compared to fermentation baits, which should reduce time and cost involved in trapping in order to monitor SWD .