Stylet penetration activities linked to the acquisition and inoculation of C andidatus L iberibacter solanacearum by its vector tomato potato psyllid
The tomato potato psyllid ( TPP ), B actericera cockerelli ( S ulc) ( H emiptera: T riozidae), is the main vector of the bacterium C andidatus L iberibacter solanacearum ( L so), a major disease of solanaceous crops. Feeding of TPP is associated with L so transmission. However, very little is known...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 2014-05, Vol.151 (2), p.170-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The tomato potato psyllid (
TPP
),
B
actericera cockerelli
(
S
ulc) (
H
emiptera:
T
riozidae), is the main vector of the bacterium
C
andidatus
L
iberibacter solanacearum (
L
so), a major disease of solanaceous crops. Feeding of
TPP
is associated with
L
so transmission. However, very little is known about the stylet penetration activities linked to acquisition and inoculation of
L
so. The electrical penetration graph (
EPG
)‐
DC
system was used to monitor stylet penetration activities during acquisition and inoculation of
L
so by individual
TPP
on tomato [
S
olanum lycopersicum
L
. (
S
olanaceae)]. Female
TPP
from
L
so‐free and
L
so‐infected colonies were used in acquisition and inoculation tests, respectively. In the acquisition tests,
TPP
were tested for
L
so after
EPG
recording of their stylet penetration activities on
L
so‐infected tomato shoots. In the inoculation tests, samples from the tomato plants on which the stylet penetration of
L
so‐infected
TPP
had been recorded were tested for
L
so infection. The relationships between
qPCR
results and the
EPG
waveforms (C, G, D, E1, and E2) representing the main stylet penetration activities performed by individual insects in inoculation and acquisition tests were investigated. Results confirmed that a single adult
TPP
is capable of infecting a plant with
L
so. Our data suggest that acquisition of the bacteria occurs during phloem ingestion (E2), and inoculation is likely associated with salivation into the phloem sieve elements (E1). The durations of
EPG
parameters were not significantly different between
L
so‐infected and
L
so‐free
TPP
(later shown by
qPCR
) in acquisition tests. In inoculation tests, the durations of E1 or E2 recorded from
TPP
on
L
so‐infected and
L
so‐free plants that were later shown by
qPCR
were not significantly different. However, C was shorter on
L
so‐infected plants than on
L
so‐free plants, where
TPP
performed phloem activities. The minimum plant access period required for
L
so transmission by a single
TPP
was estimated to be ca. 2 h, with an acquisition threshold of about 36 min. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-8703 1570-7458 |
DOI: | 10.1111/eea.12179 |