Effect of topical cyclopentolate on post-operative pain after pterygium surgery

The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of topical cyclopentolate following pterygium surgery for post-operative ocular pain. All participants had nasal pterygium and underwent pterygium excision and conjunctival autografting with fibrin glue. Participants were randomised into two groups. Particip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental optometry 2017-11, Vol.100 (6), p.595-597
Hauptverfasser: Goktas, Sertan, Sakarya, Yasar, Ozcimen, Muammer, Sakarya, Rabia, Alpfidan, Ismail, Ivacık, Ismail Senol, Erdogan, Erkan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of topical cyclopentolate following pterygium surgery for post-operative ocular pain. All participants had nasal pterygium and underwent pterygium excision and conjunctival autografting with fibrin glue. Participants were randomised into two groups. Participants in group 1 received one per cent cyclopentolate eye drops and artificial tears upon completing surgery and were prescribed self-administered drops three times daily for three days, while participants in group 2 received a control (artificial tears) in a manner identical to group 1. Data were gathered regarding post-operative pain intensity experienced during each of the three days. Pain was graded from zero to 10 according to a visual analogue scale, in which zero signified no pain and 10 signified severe, unbearable pain. This study analysed data regarding 38 participants in group 1 and 40 participants in group 2. Results were defined as median with interquartile range (IQR); median of the pain scores at days one, two and three were as follows, respectively: 4 (IQR 2), 2.5 (IQR 1) and 2 (IQR 1.25) for group 1 and 5 (IQR 1), 3 (IQR 1.75) and 3 (IQR 1) for group 2. Pain scores were significantly lower for group 1 compared with group 2 at days one, two and three (p 
ISSN:0816-4622
1444-0938
DOI:10.1111/cxo.12513