The impact of treatment choices on potential drug–drug interactions in hypertensive patients

Aims The aim of this study was to analyse potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs) and their potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among hypertensive patients. Moreover, we investigated the possibility of reducing pDDIs with different treatment choices. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical pharmacology 2022-05, Vol.88 (5), p.2340-2348
Hauptverfasser: Perić, Aneta, Udilović, Ana, Dobrić, Silva, Vezmar Kovačević, Sandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims The aim of this study was to analyse potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs) and their potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among hypertensive patients. Moreover, we investigated the possibility of reducing pDDIs with different treatment choices. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study including all outpatients with hypertension and two or more medications, treated in a university hospital in Serbia. Lexicomp Interact (Lexi‐Comp, Inc., Hudson, OH) was used for identification of pDDIs and potential ADRs. Treatment choices were explored according to patient characteristics, treatment guidelines and the interacting potential of drugs. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regression. Results A total of 350 patients were included in this study, with average age (77 [36–98] years and 6.1 [2.5]) medications. The majority of patients (86.0%) had at least one clinically significant pDDI, and the average was 3.78 (3.90) (range 1–25). Suggestions for treatment change aimed mainly at eliminating drug duplications, reducing the use of thiazide diuretics, sulfonylureas, alpha‐lipoic acid and pentoxifylline and increasing the use of calcium‐channel blockers, when appropriate. pDDIs would have decreased to 2.10 (2.52), P 
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/bcp.15168