Hemodynamic response patterns: Responder type differences in reactivity and recovery

We examined whether responder type groups reflecting patterns of hemodynamic reactivity might also differ in recovery responses. Cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and Heather index were assessed at rest and during speech and co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychophysiology 2002-11, Vol.39 (6), p.739-746
Hauptverfasser: Kline, Keith A., Saab, Patrice G., Llabre, Maria M., Spitzer, Susan B., Evans, Jovier D., McDonald, Paige A. Green, Schneiderman, Neil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We examined whether responder type groups reflecting patterns of hemodynamic reactivity might also differ in recovery responses. Cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and Heather index were assessed at rest and during speech and cold pressor tasks in young adults. Participants (n= 152) were classified as myocardial, vascular, or mixed‐mild responders based on CO and TPR responses to speech presentation. Vascular responders exhibited slower CO and TPR speech recovery than the myocardial and/or mixed‐mild groups. Responder type differences in reactivity showed limited task‐generalizability. The sustained vascular response pattern of the vascular group is consistent with that seen in hypertension. In light of associations of heightened TPR with markers of disease risk, this suggests potentially negative health implications for vascular responders.
ISSN:0048-5772
1469-8986
DOI:10.1111/1469-8986.3960739