‘Do We Still Need the CIA ?’ D aniel P atrick M oynihan, the C entral I ntelligence A gency and US F oreign Policy
In May 1991, writing in the op‐ed column of the N ew Y ork T imes , the US Senator for N ew Y ork, D aniel P atrick M oynihan, called for the C entral I ntelligence A gency to be disbanded. Arguing that the CIA represented an historical anachronism that had outlived its usefulness to A merican forei...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | History (London) 2015-04, Vol.100 (340), p.275-292 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In May 1991, writing in the op‐ed column of the
N
ew
Y
ork
T
imes
, the
US
Senator for
N
ew
Y
ork,
D
aniel
P
atrick
M
oynihan, called for the
C
entral
I
ntelligence
A
gency to be disbanded. Arguing that the
CIA
represented an historical anachronism that had outlived its usefulness to
A
merican foreign policy‐makers, Moynihan proposed that the
A
gency should be stripped of its autonomy and have its intelligence functions subsumed by the
D
epartment of
S
tate. Moynihan's rhetorical assault on the
CIA
marked the opening salvo in a protracted campaign that, over the following decade, until his death in March 2003, would see the one‐time member of the
S
enate
S
elect
C
ommittee on Intelligence lobby relentlessly for reform of
A
merica's intelligence community and against pervasive official secrecy. To date, Moynihan's evangelical fervour in championing a more open intelligence paradigm, which came to incorporate the drafting of congressional bills, the chairmanship of a bipartisan commission on government secrecy, the publication of a book, and innumerable speeches and articles, has been interpreted in a narrow personal and political context. Commentators have tended to characterize Moynihan's turn against the
CIA
, and towards government transparency as symptomatic of individual eccentricity, disenchantment with purported
A
gency excesses during the
R
eagan administration, and ill‐judged post‐
C
old
W
ar hubris. This article breaks new ground by reframing and reperiodizing Moynihan's relationship with intelligence. It suggests that
M
oynihan's attitudes to intelligence and state secrecy were formulated much earlier than has hitherto been acknowledged, and in an environment far removed from Washington's corridors of power. Specifically, the essay relocates
M
oynihan's emergence as an advocate of intelligence reform in the global political turmoil of the early 1970s when, as
R
ichard
N
ixon's ambassador to
I
ndia, he was afforded ample scope to assess the
CIA
's utility as an instrument of American diplomacy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-2648 1468-229X |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-229X.12106 |